By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

An active participant in both the Legal Committee sessions and plenary debates, consistently demanding the presentation of previously promised information. This operational pattern is typical of opposition oversight, involving the repeated posing of the same fundamental questions until a concrete answer is received.

The speaking activity is restricted to the questions and rejoinders presented during the interpellation within the plenary session, which demonstrates focused and intensive participation in the parliamentary debate. All contributions are dated to the same day, suggesting participation in a prolonged discussion.

The pattern of behavior indicates high activity during the plenary session, where the speaker made repeated procedural interventions and consistently demanded the right to ask questions without interruption. This suggests a pattern where the speaker is prepared to challenge the presiding officer's decisions extensively and persistently.

The speaker is active during information sessions, noting that they have repeatedly posed the same question to the Prime Minister, which indicates a consistent effort to keep the issue on the agenda. They are also prepared to handle procedural disputes, citing a similar situation from last week and a previous interpretation by another presiding officer.

The speaker is active during the Riigikogu information sessions, noting that they have posed the same question in three consecutive sessions. This demonstrates consistent and systematic oversight of the government's activities, as well as an effort to elicit answers by repeating the questions.

The speaker is involved in submitting interpellations and discussing them during the plenary session, specifically pointing out the long waiting period (the interpellation was submitted on May 13, 2023). There is also mention of participation in the Riigikogu Estonian-Hungarian Parliamentary Group visit to Hungary (September 1, 2023), which highlights their active role in international relations. The overall pattern observed is the consistent and detailed criticism of the government's actions.

No data available.

The speaker actively carries out the parliament’s oversight function, submitting follow-up questions during the information session (referencing the March 13th question). This reveals a pattern of systematically and consistently addressing sensitive topics, demanding full transparency. This course of action is aimed at holding the executive branch accountable.

The speaker is an active submitter of inquiries and asks supplementary questions during plenary sessions, addressing both the Prime Minister and the Minister of the Interior. It was noted that one inquiry reached the floor within the constitutional deadline (20 sitting days), which was considered a significant achievement.