By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid
Total Sessions: 149
Fully Profiled: 149
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political platform is strongly focused on addressing the democracy deficit in Estonia, demanding the restoration of the people’s right to directly elect the head of state and the right of popular initiative. The speaker also expresses serious concern regarding the European Union’s rapidly increasing debt burden and the lack of clarity surrounding its repayment, viewing this as a threat to Estonian sovereignty. The political framework is primarily value-based, emphasizing constitutional principles and the power of the people.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The most prominent issue is cultural policy and the oversight of state institutions (such as the Estonian National Museum (ERM) and the Drama Theatre). The speaker strongly opposes the Minister of Culture’s policy of non-intervention, stressing that the state has an obligation to ensure that these activities comply with laws and national cultural standards. The political framework is clearly value-based, focusing on preserving the sense of national cohesion and preventing destructive processes.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance is strongly value-driven, focusing on the principles of the rule of law and the protection of private life. The speaker vigorously opposes the bill that would retroactively legalize the mass data collection system illegally established by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board). He sees this as part of a broader program leading to the gradual loss of societal freedom and the emergence of a "large prison camp."
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The political focus is heavily centered on the demographic crisis, which is considered, from the standpoint of preserving the Estonian nation, language, and culture, to be at least as crucial as the security crisis. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's disproportionate attention and funding directed toward security, thereby relegating population issues to the background. This position is grounded in values and results, demanding immediate acknowledgment and action from the government.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's fiscal policy, forcefully criticizing the deepening of the budget deficit and what they term "living beyond our means." They emphasize fiscal responsibility and demand that the Minister of Finance adhere to previous promises to move towards a balanced budget. Furthermore, there is sharp criticism regarding the incomprehensibility of the budget documents and the overall lack of transparency.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker maintains a strongly principled stance, focusing on defending the rule of law and constitutional principles. He/She vigorously opposes both the legitimization of mistakes made in the exercise of state power and the delegation of Parliament's decision-making authority to the government concerning foreign military missions. Furthermore, he/she stands against a mass surveillance society and the indiscriminate collection of citizens' data.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political position centers on strong opposition to the government's fiscal policy, particularly the deviation from the state budget balance. The speaker highlights the violation of election promises (no tax increases, balanced budget) and calls into question the fundamental trustworthiness of the government's actions. The focus is on performance and the fulfillment of promises, accusing the government of moving in the opposite direction.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The most crucial issue is improving the regulation governing the registration of home-born children in the population register. The speaker strongly supports resolving this problem, describing the current situation as absurd, but remains critical of the draft bill's ambiguity, which grants officials excessively broad discretionary power. This stance is policy-driven and focused on improving administrative practices.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing criticism on the government’s actions and integrity concerning the maritime operation, accusing the Prime Minister of lying and inappropriate labeling. Concerns are also being raised regarding the staffing shortage within internal security (PPA) and the capability of using prisons for crisis situations. The criticism is mainly directed at the government’s inadequate performance and the creation of security threats.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly centered on the defense of constitutional rights and the principles of the rule of law. The speaker vigorously opposes draft legislation that restricts freedom of religion (PS § 40) and the right of citizens to access data concerning them (PS § 44). He labels government initiatives, such as the creation of the RAB database and total surveillance, as "totalitarian" and demands a change of direction.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The political focus has shifted to the deteriorating national security situation following the explosion of an offensive drone on Estonian territory. The speaker is urgently demanding clarity and public confirmation from the government that the territory of the Republic of Estonia is not being utilized for launching offensive operations, as doing so would expose the country to greater danger. This position strongly advocates for transparency and the defense of state sovereignty, underscoring the public's legitimate right to this information. Furthermore, a fundamental question is being raised: whether Ukraine has been granted authorization to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The political position focuses heavily on the principle of the rule of law and guaranteeing adherence to the constitution in legislative work. The speaker stresses the Riigikogu’s responsibility to ensure that state authority is exercised in compliance with the constitution (Section 3). The position is strongly procedural and value-based, underscoring the importance of institutional competence.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The political position centers on strong opposition to the issues of financial management and organizational structure identified within the Ministry of Defence's purview. This stance is robustly results-oriented, demanding accountability and the actual implementation of job terminations for the resulting mess, rather than simply hiring new personnel. The criticism is aimed squarely at the government's failure to ensure financial discipline and transparency.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on a motion of no confidence against the Minister of Health and the assessment of their performance. The key issues raised are the COVID-19 vaccine policy, the spread of misinformation, and political hypocrisy. These positions are value-based, emphasizing fundamental rights and the freedom of bodily autonomy. The speaker is personally adding a fifth point to the no-confidence motion, demonstrating strong opposition to the minister's fitness for office.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's lack of action and accountability regarding the Ministry of Defence's use of funds. Furthermore, the speaker vigorously defends constitutional rights, opposing the banning of certain business forms (savings and loan associations/credit unions) when the stated objective could be achieved through less intrusive measures. The overall framing is heavily focused on criticizing the government's poor performance and championing the defense of constitutional values.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is strongly value-based and conservative, focusing intensely on adherence to constitutionality and parliamentary rules of procedure. The speaker strongly opposes the actions of the governing coalition, particularly the imposition of new taxes and the violation of parliamentary procedural rules. Key issues include the protection of the lives of unborn children and the democratic legitimacy of the exercise of state power. The political framework is primarily value- and performance-driven, criticizing the government's failures and constitutional violations.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft legislation, which threatens the forced closure of the Estonian Orthodox Church and Pühtitsa Convent. The speaker emphasizes that the real debate must center on ensuring constitutional compliance, rather than being framed in the context of pro-Estonian versus pro-Russian sentiment. He accuses the bill's proponents of violating constitutional rights and dividing society, while prioritizing the protection of the rule of law and religious freedom. This position is fundamentally value-based, focusing on core constitutional principles.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the draft bill, which grants state structures the right to mass profile and collect data on innocent people. The speaker views this as a fundamental problem and a move in a questionable direction, where citizens’ liberties are at risk. The position is strongly value-driven, emphasizing that such a surveillance society is not a desirable option. There is a call for the legislative process of the bill to be halted.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on a value-based resistance (specifically, the transfer of Swedish prisoners to Estonia, which is viewed as a violation of national dignity) and the government's untrustworthy conduct during negotiations. The speaker stresses that the government's activities reflect value systems that diverge significantly among members of parliament. Furthermore, ministers are required to demonstrate accountability and transparency in the management of the justice system.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is firmly rooted in the defense of the Constitution and fundamental rights (freedom of religion and association). He/She is categorically opposed to the draft legislation that would force the Estonian Orthodox Church and the Pühtitsa Convent to sever canonical ties, deeming it unconstitutional. He/She accuses the bill's proponents of disseminating false propaganda and intentionally violating the Constitution under the guise of a security argument. The political framework is strongly value-based, focusing on respect for the constitutional order.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the actions and political decisions of the government (the Reform Party). The main points of contention relate to the plan to bring Swedish prisoners to Estonia (citing security risks, reputational damage, and low revenue) and the drastic decline in the sense of national cohesion, which is directly linked to tax hikes and social reforms.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The political focus is centered on the crisis in the standard of legal education and the inadequate preparation of Riigikogu members for legislative work, a situation that fosters disregard for the Constitution. The individual demands radical steps to rectify the situation, including initiating a debate on separating the Constitutional Court from the Court of Cassation, as well as mandatory professional development for parliamentarians. These positions are strongly critical and value-driven, underscoring the supremacy of the Constitution.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issue is the violation of the principles of the rule of law by the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) through the clandestine establishment of a mass license plate recognition system. The political stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing the necessity of restoring political control over law enforcement structures and demanding accountability for the collection of data without a legal basis. It is stressed that such activity severely infringes upon the inviolability of private life and contravenes the Personal Data Protection Act. The political framework is highly procedural, focusing on the fact that the Riigikogu (Parliament) has never discussed or approved such a system.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on two main issues: the gender quota bill, which is viewed as a manifestation of totalitarian ideology, and the tax hikes, which are considered undemocratic and a breach of promises. Emphasis is placed on the principles of freedom and limiting state power, contrasting them with the first postulate of liberalism. The speaker demands that snap elections be held due to the undemocratic nature of the tax increases.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The political focus centers on the political accountability for the maritime incident (the tanker inspection) and the propriety of how the operation was executed. The speaker urgently insists that such serious operations must be pre-approved by the government (the Prime Minister or a relevant Minister), underscoring the necessity of a political decision. This stance is heavily oriented toward evaluating the government's performance and leadership (performance-driven).
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position centers on strong opposition to the tax hikes introduced by the ruling coalition (the Reform Party and Eesti 200). These increases are viewed as a betrayal of the voters and a lack of mandate. The speaker urgently calls for snap elections to secure a democratic mandate for the proposed tax increases. The overall political framework is heavily focused on criticizing the government's actions and credibility, citing its low approval ratings (13–20%).
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is highly critical of the government's performance, highlighting the weak execution of state functions in border regions and the failure to meet economic objectives (productivity, competitiveness). The critique is primarily results-oriented, demanding that the government acknowledge the facts concerning immigration and economic divergence. Political solutions are proposed to mitigate regional inequality through tax incentives.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on the defense of the rule of law and constitutionality. The speaker categorically opposes the draft law, which violates religious freedom by demanding the severance of canonical ties, calling it a disgrace to the parliament. They also oppose joining the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), considering it a pointless exercise in image creation that fails to address real democratic problems. The emphasis on the principle that the end does not justify every means demonstrates strong opposition to political pragmatism that disregards the constitution.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The political focus is on protecting the principles of the rule of law, opposing the illegal actions of state authorities in the construction of a mass surveillance system (license plate recording). The speaker adopts a strong, value-driven stance, demanding accountability from the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the Ministry of the Interior, and resisting the entrenchment of surveillance society practices. The issue raised is framed as a massive legal violation that must be followed by sanctions.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to members of the Riigikogu (Parliament) serving on the Council for the Administration and Development of Courts (KHAN), emphasizing the crucial importance of the principle of the separation of powers. Criticism is directed at the appointment of coalition representatives, which is seen as an attempt by the government to maintain its control function over the judicial system. Furthermore, there is a demand for the judicial reform to be carried out holistically and systematically, rather than piecemeal, supporting a conceptually pure approach.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
His political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on increasing national defense capability through the promotion of widespread gun ownership and trust in citizens. He sharply opposes "gender ideology," labeling it irrational, and criticizes the government's practice of ignoring existing law for ideological reasons. He also stresses the need to ensure that the prosecutor's office responds appropriately to illegal activity (the Pihlakodu case).
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on the principle of the rule of law and demanding strict adherence to the rules of good lawmaking. All government bills must include a constitutional analysis, the systematic absence of which is met with strong opposition. This stance is strongly procedural and value-based, emphasizing the realization of the principle of legality. Opposition is expressed to the position of the Minister of Justice, which suggests that the analysis can be conducted selectively if the infringement of rights does not appear intense.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly focused on defending the bill to lower excise duties and criticizing the simplified fiscal analyses presented by the opposing side. Emphasis is placed on the need for substantive engagement and evidence-based analyses in the legislative process, thereby calling into question the integrity of the Riigikogu’s procedures. The stance is heavily policy- and procedure-centric.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the Prime Minister’s premature expression of readiness to send the Estonian Defence Forces to Ukraine, emphasizing responsibility and the need to avoid the risk of the country being drawn into war. This stance is firmly centered on constitutional adherence, demanding that decisions regarding foreign missions be made by the Riigikogu (Parliament), not the government. The speaker categorically rejects the derogatory term "self-preservation," replacing it instead with "elementary responsibility."
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker firmly advocates for the protection of the principle of the rule of law and constitutional guarantees, particularly the privilege against self-incrimination. They express concern regarding the draft legislation for transposing the ECN+ directive, noting that it leaves the constitutional compliance for legal entities ambiguous and is procedurally flawed. The political stance is strongly value-based, stressing the quality of law-making and adherence to the constitution. They view the government's decision to abandon the initial plan, which would have resulted in serious constitutional violations, as a positive development.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition to the large-scale wind and technology park project being implemented by the government, a project deemed contrary to the best interests of Estonian society. The speaker emphasizes that the project serves narrow corporate interests, and that their stance is fundamentally value-based, focused on protecting the welfare of the people. Crucial elements include the protection of property owners and ensuring fair compensation for easements (or "servitude fees"), citing Danish law as an example.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a strong, value-based position against the current e-voting system, stressing that it undermines democratic legitimacy and constitutional principles. The primary political objective is to restore confidence in the electoral system—which nearly 40% of citizens distrust—and to strongly advocate for the establishment of an investigative committee. This position is fundamentally procedural and rooted in the rule of law, thereby calling into question the legal force of legislation passed by a parliament installed as a result of those elections.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the decision-making process for major infrastructure projects (offshore wind farms and the reconstruction of the electricity grid). The speaker is a strong proponent of direct democracy, stressing that the ultimate sovereign power rests with the people, and proposes holding a national referendum for decisions that have far-reaching consequences. This stance is value-based, focusing on democratic procedures and respect for the will of the people.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly geared towards direct democracy, demanding the organization of a referendum concerning the gigantic offshore wind farm project, citing the first paragraph of the Constitution. Emphasis is placed on the right of the people, as the bearer of the supreme state power, to make decisions, particularly when billions of euros and extensive environmental impact are involved. This stance is value-based, focusing on popular sovereignty.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the motor vehicle tax, which is deemed unfair and unconstitutional for several reasons. The focus is value-based, emphasizing the obligation to provide special care for large families and people with disabilities, an obligation that the imposed tax violates. The speaker criticizes the government's deliberate disregard for the constitution when adopting the law.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely anti-government, centered on opposing tax hikes (such as the car tax and land tax) and draft legislation that infringes upon the rule of law and religious freedom. It stresses constitutional values, particularly the protection of large families and people with disabilities, and condemns the government's actions as shameful, dishonest, and manipulative. The political framework itself is strongly value-driven and highly critical of the government's performance.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is currently centered on the transparency and accountability of state spending, particularly concerning the 100 million euro defense industry order placed for Ukraine. The speaker sharply criticizes the lack of information regarding the companies involved, the products, and the prices, thereby calling the government's priorities into question by contrasting this expenditure with the difficulties faced in funding teacher salary increases. The stance taken is strongly demanding of transparency and is results-oriented.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the inaccurate representation of the bill's content, particularly concerning the sanctions imposed for violating gender balance requirements. It is stressed that the draft legislation mandates substantial monetary penalties (up to 400,000 euros), contrary to the claims made by the opposing side. This discrepancy points to fierce political resistance regarding the manner in which the bill is being presented. Furthermore, a question is being raised about the legal definition of gender identity (biological versus social gender) within the law.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill concerning the forced dissolution of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate and the Pühtitsa Convent. The speaker stresses that this is a disgrace that violates the fundamental principles of the rule of law and religious freedom. The position is clearly value-based, prioritizing constitutionality and tolerance, and arguing that the bill is emotional and appeals to base fears.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is heavily focused on increasing the compensation for reservists, viewing this as critical to the very foundations of national defense. The speaker criticizes the government's priorities, calling it disgraceful to spend billions on foreign arms corporations while simultaneously leaving reservists underpaid. This position is value-based, emphasizing respect and fair treatment for the people of Estonia.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition to the government coalition's initiatives, especially the bill expanding the powers of the Party Financing Surveillance Committee (ERJK), which is deemed a "monstrosity" that violates the principle of the rule of law. The political position is vigorously value-based, emphasizing the need to restore the right of popular initiative, organize referendums, and legalize the direct election of the president. It criticizes the government for anti-family initiatives, tax hikes, and provocations that exacerbate the security situation. The entire activity of the government coalition is considered fundamentally misguided.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance strongly focuses on valuing motherhood within national policy, considering it the foundation for the birth rate. The speaker criticizes the current situation where politicians only value motherhood in words, but fail to back it up with real action. This position is value-based and is geared towards considering specific fiscal policy measures.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on fierce opposition to the restrictions and vaccination pressure imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, demanding an independent investigation into the safety and quality of mRNA vaccines. The speaker stresses the importance of respecting constitutional rights and sharply criticizes the irresponsible conduct of the government and various agencies, particularly concerning the pressure exerted to vaccinate children. This stance is clearly value-based, calling for accountability and transparency, and is directed toward a critical analysis of the errors made during the pandemic.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The political position heavily focuses on increasing parliamentary scrutiny of the government, demanding the mandatory appearance of ministers before the Riigikogu’s investigative committees. This stance is principled, emphasizing the government’s accountability (its obligation to report) to the Riigikogu, and criticizing the discretion currently afforded in this matter. The framing is strongly procedural and value-based, stressing the universal character of the rules.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The political position centers on deep concern regarding the shift in Estonia's security doctrine, sharply criticizing anti-US rhetoric and the "needless provocation" directed at Russia. The speaker challenges the government's assertion that Estonia is better protected than ever before, and questions whether the security doctrine has shifted toward the European Union in ensuring national security. The stance is strongly value-driven, highlighting the lack of shared values with the new US administration.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most prominent issue is the opposition to the government's offshore wind farm subsidy scheme, which is being treated as systematic lying and the attempted largest-scale fraud in Estonian history. The political position is strongly oppositional, demanding the immediate resignation of the minister and the assumption of political responsibility. The focus is on the transparency and honesty of the government's actions, which is framed as performance- and value-based criticism.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
His political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s current program, which he believes actually increases both internal and external security threats. He passionately resists the revocation of voting rights for non-citizens in local elections and the harassment of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. His positions are value-driven, emphasizing the principles of the rule of law and criticizing the use of the security threat as a "magic wand" in the absence of substantive arguments.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government bill concerning the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate and Pühtitsa Convent. The stance is value-based, emphasizing the violation of the principles of religious freedom and the rule of law, and warning against underestimating the geopolitical situation (the US power shift/coup). The bill is branded as fundamentally deceitful and creating, rather than protecting against, a security threat to Estonia. The political activity is framed by the defense of fundamental constitutional principles and opposition to decisions stemming from "spinal cord" reflexes (i.e., knee-jerk reactions).
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's bill restricting religious freedom, arguing that it threatens Estonia's largest church and monastery and increases security risks. The political framework is clearly value-based, emphasizing the necessity of protecting fundamental values (religious freedom, freedom of speech, democracy) both within Estonia and in accordance with the expectations of the new US administration. The speaker also challenges the government's stance on the reality of the threat of a Russian attack, citing the Foreign Intelligence Service report.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, demanding the prime minister's resignation, citing the public's lack of trust in the government (as evidenced by low approval ratings). Key points of emphasis include tax hikes that are deepening the economic recession, a non-existent family policy, and issues within the energy sector that suggest a criminal pattern. The opposition is focused on the government's inefficiency and lack of credibility, stemming from both its policies and its overall performance.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to Government Bill 570, which concerns the forced closure of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate and the Pühtitsa Convent. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the protection of the principle of the rule of law and opposition to punishing potential future threats rather than actions that have actually been committed. The speaker criticizes the lack of rational analysis regarding topics related to Russia.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly critical of the direction of Estonian foreign policy, which is viewed as a lack of independence and the obedient implementation of guidelines set by external allies. The most critical issues are national sovereignty, participation in foreign aggressions (Iraq), and the destruction of energy independence through the green transition. The speaker demands concrete examples from the government demonstrating where national interests, rather than the choices of allies, have been prioritized.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is currently directed at the government's energy sector development plan and the enormous costs associated with it. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the current process, criticizing the rushed nature of the decisions and the lack of broad support. The core issue being raised is primarily procedural and centered on financial accountability, demanding clarity regarding the cost, which runs into billions of euros.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on opposing the teaching of the concept of social or psychological gender in Estonian schools. The speaker frames the opposing viewpoint as a "complete lie" and "ideological brainwashing," emphasizing a worldview rooted in biological facts. The stance is intensely confrontational and uncompromising.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft law concerning the Georgian elections, labeling it as based on falsehoods and inappropriate interference in Georgia’s internal affairs. The central framework is value-based, emphasizing national sovereignty, non-interference in the internal affairs of other states, and the necessity of an independent foreign policy, contrasting this stance with the "subservience characteristic of vassals." The need to improve democracy and the electoral system in Estonia is also highlighted, demanding greater decision-making power for the populace.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political position strongly centers on the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states, a principle deemed crucial for Estonian security. The speaker sharply criticizes the growing tendency in Europe to annul election results when they are not favorable to the central authorities of the European Union. The government's foreign policy is viewed as selective and hypocritical, prompting questions about the criteria used to justify intervention in Georgia but not in Romania. This political framework is value-based, emphasizing respect for sovereignty and democratic processes.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political platform places a strong emphasis on the transparency and efficiency of the national defense budget. The speaker rejects a purely slogan-driven approach, instead demanding concrete analyses and a qualitative leap forward in development, rather than just a simple budget increase. The position is skeptical and results-oriented, raising doubts about the actual effect of the 1.6 billion euro expenditure on national defense capabilities.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most important topic is energy security and the pace at which we phase out oil shale energy. The speaker expresses moderate opposition to the current plan, considering it premature, especially given the vulnerability of submarine cables revealed by the Estlink 2 incident, and the simultaneous disconnection from the Russian electricity grid. The shaping of this position is heavily policy- and risk-based.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position centers on demanding government transparency regarding the planning of wind farms, and expresses strong skepticism about the realism and technical feasibility of transitioning to 100% renewable energy. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of providing the Estonian public with a comprehensive overview of the planned wind turbines, prioritizing procedural transparency and energy supply security. The questions posed are aimed at evaluating the realism and implementation of the policy.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political focus is on international law and sovereignty. He/She is strongly opposed to the Foreign Minister’s actions concerning Georgia (sanctions, supporting the opposition), accusing him/her of damaging Estonian-Georgian relations and violating the Vienna Convention. He/She stresses that countries must have the freedom to decide their own future, including EU accession, opposing imposed obedience, which he/she refers to as the "Soviet mentality."
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, centering on the government's failures regarding legislative procedures and adherence to the principles of the rule of law. The speaker sharply criticizes the deviation from the democratic process and demands that critical viewpoints be taken into account during the appointment of judges. The criticism is primarily value-based, emphasizing the relationship between internal justice and external regulation (a reference to Plato).
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on two primary issues: the unregulated planning of gigantic wind turbines (stressing that human health must take priority over national defense) and the delegation of the Riigikogu’s constitutional authority to the government concerning the deployment of troops on military missions. The speaker deems it unacceptable for parliament to surrender its rights to the government on such crucial security matters. Their framework is value-based, emphasizing the principles of a parliamentary state and public health.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the 800-euro state levy proposed in the draft bill for deregistering a vehicle. The stance is principled, emphasizing that the state fee must correspond to the actual costs of the procedure, rather than serving as a hidden penalty. The framing of the issue is strongly policy-based, focusing on the conceptual correctness of the legislation.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The most crucial issue is the organization of mining for state-owned mineral resources (phosphorite, oil shale). The speaker strongly opposes the use of a concession mechanism and advocates for the establishment of a state-owned joint-stock company to ensure that all profits accrue for the benefit of the Estonian people. This stance is strongly driven by policy and values, emphasizing national gain.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, accusing the government of being hostile towards children and families and casting doubt on their efforts to ensure child welfare. These positions are strongly value-driven, focusing on opposing the funding of abortion and expressing concern about international mechanisms interfering with Estonian domestic law. The speaker expresses intense opposition to the government’s actions.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the defense of the principles of constitutionality and international law, particularly concerning mandates for the deployment of the defense forces. The speaker rejects the government’s carte blanche for participation in military operations and sharply criticizes the new security tax, calling into question its actual effect on security. The political framework is strongly value-based, demanding moral consistency and the avoidance of double standards.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on the absolute protection of children from sexual predators and safeguarding the lives of the unborn. The speaker vigorously opposes the current legislative complexity—a "thicket of norms"—and demands simple, unambiguous, and unconditional regulations. He/She criticizes the inconsistent approach taken by the government/Parliament on child protection issues, accusing them of lacking sufficient seriousness regarding the stated objective.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is characterized by strong skepticism concerning both the human contribution to global warming and the efficacy of the measures adopted by the European Union. The speaker demands that these claims be substantiated, criticizing their presentation as if they were an article of faith. This is a value-driven framework that fundamentally challenges both scientific and political authority.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly centered on legislative accountability and national security. While supporting the principle that suffrage should be limited exclusively to citizens of the Republic of Estonia, the core concern is that the proposed bill currently under consideration could actually exacerbate security risks. We urgently demand a thorough analysis of security risks be conducted before any decision is made, prioritizing prudence and risk mitigation above all else.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The political position involves strong opposition to the government's misuse of the security card, demanding rational facts and analyses as the basis for political conclusions. The individual opposes the extensive restriction of local government voting rights, arguing that there is no evidence that the system, which has been in effect for 30 years, suddenly poses an intolerable security threat. The speaker questions the government's actions, which devalue the concept of a security threat through empty gesturing.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The most prominent topic is the connection between government tax hikes and ensuring national security. The speaker strongly challenges the government coalition's assertion that the massive tax increase will make a real and significant difference in defense capability. The focus is on the effectiveness of the policy and the justification of the financial expenditures, demanding results-based accountability from the government.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's budget policy and the rhetoric surrounding the 'fixing' of state finances. The main issues are cost savings achieved by cutting ideological programs and opposing the removal of health insurance from stay-at-home mothers. The speaker views parliamentarism in Estonia as "completely neutralized" and the government's activities as an ineffective "theater performance."
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government's escalation-minded security policy, highlighting the risk of war on Estonian territory and the complete absence of evacuation plans. He/She vigorously defends the religious freedom and canonical ties of the Pühtitsa Convent, accusing the government of constitutional violation. The political stance is deeply rooted in values (constitutional rights) and results-oriented (the government's failure to prepare for a crisis). He/She also questions the logical implications of the program supporting Ukraine, particularly if it necessitates direct NATO intervention.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The most prominent theme is the protection of the right to life for the unborn and the termination of state funding for elective abortions, which is treated as a moral and constitutional obligation. The political stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing the sanctity of human life and criticizing the government's anti-family policies and indifference toward the demographic crisis. The speaker is convinced that the government's actions are "anti-human" and "grotesque," and stresses the need for repentance.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government's foreign mission policy, emphasizing adherence to international law and the Estonian Constitution. The speaker firmly objects to delegating the Riigikogu's decision-making authority to the government regarding the deployment of defense forces on foreign missions, citing a violation of Article 128 of the Constitution. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes Estonia's participation in the mission Inherent Resolve, which, in their view, supports the occupation of Syrian territory, thereby contradicting Estonian principles. This opposition is both value-based and procedural, demanding serious respect for the Constitution.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government's ambitious green transition targets (100% renewable electricity), deeming them economically harmful and unrealistic. Their political stance is outcome-driven, highlighting the stagnation of Estonian industry and weak economic growth. They also bring up the issue of demographic sustainability, which they believe the government is failing to address. The overall position is critical and challenges the current setting of priorities.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's violation of constitutional rights and illegal activities (e.g., the Lihula monument). The speaker vigorously opposes measures targeting the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, accusing the government of provoking conflict. The political framework is value-based, emphasizing the protection of rule-of-law principles and comparing the government's actions to those of Russia.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political position is fiercely opposed to the government's actions, focusing specifically on the violation of rule of law principles and the unfair use of public funds. The speaker criticizes the police for infringing upon the inviolability of private property (referencing the Lihula monument case) and deems it unjust to channel taxpayer money toward renewable energy companies that are already generating tens of millions of euros in profit. His position is strongly value-driven, emphasizing justice and strict adherence to the law.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is on regulating the banking sector and introducing a bank tax, which is deemed necessary to prevent banks from extracting outrageously large, unearned profits from Estonia. This stance is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the state's obligation to protect the populace from "plundering," and setting this objective above ensuring investor attractiveness.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is fiercely anti-government, focusing its criticism on issues of national memory (specifically, the obstruction of the Lihula monument) and institutional incompetence (the construction of empty prisons). The speaker expresses strong opposition to the criminalization of hate speech following the UK model, seeing this as a threat to civil liberties and potentially leading to the creation of "prisoners of conscience." These positions are strongly value-based, emphasizing national dignity and the fight against corruption.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing its criticism on the government's fiscal management and budgetary procedure. The most salient issues are the question of the constitutionality of the state budget and the lack of clarity regarding the purpose of the tax increases (whether they are for security spending or simply plugging holes). The criticism targets the lack of transparency in the government's actions and its contradictory explanations, citing the concerns raised by high-ranking state officials (the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General).
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly rooted in family values, opposing government bills that are deemed hostile to the family unit. The speaker objects to the elimination of health insurance for stay-at-home mothers, viewing it as part of a broader series of cuts to family policy, including the reduction of benefits for large families. This position is clearly value-driven, defending a family model in which one spouse is dedicated to the home.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The political position is strongly antagonistic toward draft legislation that carries significant risks or leaves dangerous loopholes open, particularly concerning child protection. The speaker is worried about the practical implications of the bill, which could transform the role of coaches into that of investigators and infringe upon personal privacy. This position is value-based and centers on the ethical integrity of the legislation.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The politician strongly emphasizes the need for transparency and public involvement in the decision-making process concerning core national issues, such as phosphorite mining and the deployment of servicemen to Ukraine. He harshly criticizes the government for the bankruptcy of state-owned airlines and the squandering of taxpayer funds, demanding accountability. His political focus is centered on scrutinizing government actions and promoting democratic principles, specifically the use of referendums.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is strongly opposed to the introduction of a new motor vehicle tax, arguing that the fuel excise duty already essentially fulfills the function of such a tax. This political stance seeks to scrutinize the transparency of government operations and spending, demanding answers regarding the earmarked use of excise revenue. The focus is results-based and policy-driven, highlighting the need to restore the funding scheme that was temporarily decoupled during the previous crisis.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position focuses on protecting the principles of the rule of law and strictly adhering to the requirement for mandatory constitutional analysis of the Regulation of the Government of the Republic (HÕNTE). The speaker strongly opposes proposals to relax or eliminate this requirement, emphasizing its fundamental necessity during the adoption of legislation. Their framework is distinctly procedural and value-based, underscoring the importance of laws that comply with the constitution.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position centers on strong opposition to the government's fiscal practices, particularly the opaque distribution of domestic grants (3.2 billion euros). The speaker criticizes the government’s actions as hypocritical, noting that while Riigikogu parliamentary earmarks were abolished, the same practice is being continued by the government on a much larger scale. The focus is on criticizing the government's activities and performance, demanding fundamental conclusions and the termination of this practice.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly focused on the defense of the constitution, criticizing laws adopted by the Riigikogu (Acts 317 SE and 332 SE) as being clearly unconstitutional. Specific emphasis is placed on opposing the delegation of the right to decide on the use of the Defence Forces to the Government, and the expropriation of property without fair compensation. The position is strongly principled and procedural, centering on the limits of legislative authority.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasizes the demographic crisis and supports the development of a package of measures aimed at boosting the birth rate. The issue of police officer recruitment and the guarantees offered to them is also crucial. The political position is defined by a strong, value-based opposition to asset seizure, which the speaker likens to a criminal way of thinking.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The political position is strongly values-based, focusing on historical memory and resistance to the Soviet occupation. The speaker forcefully opposes the government’s action in removing the Lihula monument, calling it "deeply shameful" and accusing the government of amplifying Russia’s historical narrative. He emphasizes that the state should honor the men who defended the Estonian people against criminal occupation.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political position centers on opposing the government's planned tax increases, stressing that the Reform Party-led government lacks the popular mandate necessary for these actions. This stance is strongly value-based, citing the violation of Article 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia and the principles governing democratic state organization. The speaker demands either the abandonment of the tax hikes or the organization of snap elections to seek a mandate.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The most prominent stance is strong opposition to the government's plan to tax land under private homes, which is viewed as a violation of the sanctity of private property. The political position is value-driven, stressing that the government’s actions—including tax hikes and infringing upon the inviolability of the home—are leading the country in the wrong direction. The speaker is categorically opposed to all government tax increases, citing Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's broken election promises.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on the protection of constitutional rights and freedoms, particularly regarding the legality of COVID restrictions (vaccine passports, limitations on demonstrations). The speaker sharply criticizes the judiciary and the government for their inaction in upholding the principles of the rule of law. He urgently demands that substantive positions be adopted concerning long-standing constitutional disputes, such as the issue of e-voting.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position is one of strong opposition to the Riigikogu's statement regarding the Georgian draft law, deeming it an embarrassingly misplaced interference in the internal affairs of another sovereign state. The core argument rests on the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of nations and highlights the government's use of double standards in its foreign policy. The speaker warns that such conduct paves the way for similar intervention in Estonia's internal matters, citing the issue of e-elections as an example.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly conditional and skeptical regarding Ukraine's accession to the European Union, emphasizing that due to deeply entrenched problems (especially corruption), membership is inconceivable without significant concessions. The question is also raised concerning the state's role in managing economic-philosophical issues, such as usury. These positions are aimed at establishing the necessary conditions and value-based premises for the policy.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on resistance to new taxes (the car tax) and over-regulation (the crypto asset market law). Their positions are value-driven (protection of private property, freedom) and systematically frame the coalition's actions as destructive to business and entrepreneurship. They promise to repeal the tax hikes and the laws established by the coalition at the earliest opportunity.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
There is strong opposition to the government's economic policy, particularly the increasing bureaucratic and tax burden, which is deteriorating the business environment. The most prominent issue is the protection of children from pornography, which is framed as a matter of core values and national dignity. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of acting independently, even if it means disregarding European Union directives for the sake of national priorities. The political stance is strongly focused on values and enforcement, criticizing the government’s empty slogans.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, sharply criticizing the increased bureaucratic burden placed on local municipalities without providing them with additional funding. In strategic issues (such as nuclear energy), they emphasize a value-based approach, demanding a state majority ownership stake to ensure that projects serve the interests of the Estonian people, rather than being driven solely by corporate profit.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's foreign policy, particularly regarding the Foreign Minister's interference in Georgia's internal affairs, which is considered a blatant violation of international law and diplomatic principles. The speaker supports the substance of Georgia's controversial foreign agents law, viewing it as a reasonable measure to ensure transparency, similar to the US FARA act. Furthermore, the speaker deems Estonia's e-voting system undemocratic, opaque, and unacceptable.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The most striking issue is the Reform Party backtracking on its election promises, particularly concerning the income tax reform and the tax exemption for the average pension. The speaker adopts a fiercely confrontational stance, emphasizing the government's lack of credibility and the issuing of unfunded promises. The focus is heavily directed toward evaluating the government's performance and its delivery on promises.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political position focuses on two themes: increasing transport efficiency (125cc scooters with B-category licenses) and, particularly intensively, the protection of the right to life of unborn children, which is treated as a fundamental constitutional and human rights issue. The government's funding of abortion is considered a violation of the principle of the rule of law and is labeled dystopian. The framing is predominantly value-based (the abortion issue) and efficiency-oriented (the transport issue).
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Speaking on behalf of the EKRE faction, the speaker expresses strong opposition to the draft bill concerning the confiscation of Russian assets. This opposition is justified by constitutional concerns and national security interests. The core stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to the principles of the rule of law (Article 32 of the Constitution) and warning against pushing Estonia onto the front lines of an international conflict. Political ambition must be pursued within the framework of the constitution, not the reverse.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s foreign and defense policy, as the speaker believes it will lead Estonia into a war with Russia, which is the paramount concern. This stance is motivated by the fear of catastrophic consequences and underscores the necessity of adhering to the Riigikogu mandate and the constitutional order. The speaker also acknowledges concerns regarding mass immigration, birth rates, and the economy, but deems the threat of war more significant than these.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The most prominent topic is the change in the definition of marriage and its potential restoration as a union solely between a man and a woman. The political position is value-based, focusing on the parliament's right to reverse the legislative amendment while simultaneously questioning the constitutionality of revoking rights that have already been granted. This position is strongly oriented towards the protection of traditional values.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political emphasis is strongly value-based, focusing on citizens' fundamental rights, such as non-discrimination and the presumption of innocence, particularly concerning access to vital services. The speaker supports the Chancellor of Justice's proposal regarding the banking sector, but simultaneously calls for the resolution of deeper, principled issues. Furthermore, he/she expresses deep skepticism regarding the claims made by the government and security agencies, demanding the presentation of facts and evidence.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance centers on the reliability and legitimacy of the electoral system, an issue deemed an exceptionally serious problem for Estonian national affairs. The speaker is vehemently opposed to e-voting, stressing its lack of oversight and transparency, factors which have driven public confidence to a dangerously low level (citing a 48.1% trust rating). This framework is deeply rooted in values, underscoring the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and democratic ideals, while cautioning that the erosion of trust could result in the forfeiture of the state's legitimacy.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political focus is directed toward higher taxation of banks to prevent the siphoning off of "wild profits," and toward adherence to the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu. The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance, accusing the governing parties of seeking personal gain and arbitrarily violating parliamentary procedure. This position is deeply value-based, emphasizing justice and opposition to the elite's exploitation of society.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the constitutional and procedural correctness of the government’s actions. The speaker sharply criticizes the Prime Minister for his handling of the Estonia-Ukraine security agreement, accusing him of disregarding the Riigikogu’s right to ratification and potentially making untrue claims regarding the nature of the agreement. The criticism is aimed at both policy and execution (performance), emphasizing the need for parliamentary oversight when undertaking military and asset-related obligations.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is centered on the crisis of trust in the electoral system and the legitimacy of state power. The speaker strongly opposes either introducing or continuing the e-voting system, arguing that it deepens mistrust and jeopardizes the foundations of democratic societal order. This stance is value-based, emphasizing constitutional principles and the role of the people as the bearer of the ultimate sovereign power. They demand that time be taken for a serious, in-depth examination of the issue so that public confidence in elections can grow.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position is strongly critical of the government's actions, focusing on administrative failures within the education system and the necessity of taking responsibility. The criticism is directed both at the government's poor operational performance (IT malfunctions) and at a fundamental value-based issue, demanding the guaranteed preservation of the Estonian nation, language, and culture, as stipulated in the preamble of the constitution. The speaker explicitly calls for the minister's resignation, citing the conduct of the Lithuanian Minister of Education as an example.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the statement calling for the forced termination of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, considering it to be incitement to hatred and unlawful. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the principles of religious freedom and the rule of law, while condemning the deliberate insulting of Orthodox believers. The speaker demands concrete evidence of illegal activity from the government, insisting that action should not be taken merely on the basis of potential threats.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill concerning the doubling of fine rates. The stance is primarily substantive and procedural, criticizing the government's alleged incompetence and its attempt to cover the state budget deficit through new taxes and levies. It is emphasized that the true purpose of the bill is to fill the state treasury, not to cover procedural costs, as claimed.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s policies regarding both the European Union’s climate measures and abortion policy. Climate policy is criticized for being overly ideological and inefficient, drawing comparisons to the mechanisms of the Soviet Union. The primary focus is value-based, stressing the constitutional right to life and the state’s duty to protect unborn children. The speaker demands legal and moral consistency from the government in upholding constitutional ideals.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu and the trustworthiness of the electoral system. The speaker sharply criticizes the practice of bundling amendment proposals and asserts that public trust in the internet voting system is extremely low (around 40%). The stances taken are highly procedural and value-based, emphasizing adherence to the principles of the rule of law and logic in the legislative process.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The political focus is on national security and constitutional propriety, especially concerning the potential deployment of the Defense Forces to Ukraine without a mandate from the Riigikogu (Parliament). He/She expresses strong concern that such an action could lead the Republic of Estonia into military hostilities with Russia. Furthermore, he/she emphasizes the need for transparency in the negotiations of international treaties (the WHO pandemic treaty), criticizing the closed nature of the process.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The political focus is heavily centered on national defense and the transparency of government operations, particularly regarding the potential deployment of Estonian defense forces personnel to Ukraine. The speaker adopts a strong oppositional position, demanding a clear answer from the Prime Minister and emphasizing the constitutional order, which mandates that the Riigikogu (Parliament) must approve foreign missions and treaties involving military commitments. The overall framework is highly procedural and value-driven, concentrating on safeguarding the rights of the Riigikogu.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly value-driven and conservative, focusing on the protection of children and families, and the preservation of the nation-state. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's cuts to family policy and the participation of Estonian diplomats in ideological activism abroad (Hungary), deeming this unacceptable interference in internal affairs. These positions are framed by constitutional obligations (the survival of the nation, special care for large families) and moral convictions. The homo- and gender-ideological agenda is particularly strongly opposed.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on the principles of the rule of law, particularly the creation of a system to ensure effective oversight and accountability of the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker strongly emphasizes that the identification of violations must be followed by sanctions, not merely the documentation of the violation. Furthermore, he/she criticizes the coalition's previous actions, which violated the working environment of the Legal Affairs Committee by brazenly pushing through the so-called value-based law (the project concerning the perversion of marriage).
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus is on national defense and parliamentary oversight of the government's activities. The speaker expresses strong concern regarding the potential participation of active servicemen or reservists of the Estonian Defence Forces in tasks related to military operations in Ukraine, demanding a concrete answer from the government. The criticism is aimed at the government's alleged overstepping of its authority, referring to Riigikogu decision 317 as a "blank check."
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely anti-government and values-driven, centering on the defense of traditional marriage and sharp criticism of mass immigration. The speaker highlights the undermining of the state's foundations and the protection of constitutional liberties (the right to demonstrate) against unlawful police intervention. Furthermore, he accuses the government of disregarding the will of the electorate and polarizing society.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The most prominent issue is the strong opposition to the e-voting system, which is deemed unconstitutional and destructive to the legitimacy of democracy. This political stance is value-based, stressing the paramount importance of election integrity over mere convenience, and demanding the restoration of fundamental democratic rights for the populace, such as the right to initiate referenda. The system is criticized as a success story for the Reform Party, one that has led to a crisis in the legitimacy of state power, given that nearly 40% of citizens do not trust the electoral system.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on protecting the principles of the rule of law, demanding the immediate clarification of the vague restrictions on activities and the definition of a related person within the anti-corruption act. The speaker is strongly critical of the Ministry of Justice's inaction and the sense of impunity felt by the Prosecutor's Office, calling the situation a disgrace to the Republic of Estonia. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the importance of the principles of legal clarity and personal accountability.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on the deterioration of families' economic situation due to inflation and tax hikes. Heavy emphasis is placed on the government's anti-family measures, and the excessive optimism of national defense leaders is criticized. The political framework is a blend of value-based (family) and results-based (economic incompetence) criticism.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The political focus is on critically important national security issues, emphasizing the need for the Republic of Estonia to avoid involvement in the military activities in Ukraine in order to avoid war with Russia. The political stance is strongly value-based and confrontational, focusing on the fate of the nation and the Prime Minister’s responsibility in the event of a threat of war. The speaker demands explicit confirmation that Estonia has not sent a single active serviceman or reservist from the Defence Forces to carry out military tasks.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The political platform centers on robust support for direct democracy and the implementation of popular sovereignty. The speaker asserts that in the organization of Estonian state affairs, there is a serious disconnect between the declared ideal of democracy and the reality on the ground, because the populace lacks the right to popular initiative and referendums. They demand electoral reform, criticizing nationwide party lists and the lack of transparency surrounding e-voting, and strongly advocate for allowing binding referendums at the local level.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily directed toward family policy and demography, opposing the reduction of benefits for large families. The speaker urgently emphasizes that the survival of one's own nation is the ultimate priority, one that should outweigh expenditures on Rail Baltic, the green transition, and aid to Ukraine. This stance is value-based, citing the disregard for the government's oath of office and the Constitution, which mandates ensuring the preservation of the Estonian nation.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The political focus is heavily concentrated on national security and the avoidance of direct military conflict with Russia, a priority stemming directly from the war in Ukraine. The speaker is demanding concrete and explicit guarantees from the Prime Minister that the Estonian Defence Forces will not intervene in military operations in Ukraine, and that the PM will not evacuate the country during a crisis. This is framed as strong, results-oriented criticism of the government’s actions, which, the speaker argues, could potentially lead Estonia into war.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is firmly against the plan to close rural schools, particularly high schools with fewer than one hundred students. This stance is value-driven, highlighting the lack of equal treatment and labeling the resulting burden on students as "forced labor." The position targets the unfair burden imposed by the state specifically on rural children.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing its criticism on tax policy (the car tax, income tax hikes, and the rejection of a bank tax) and social values (the redefinition of marriage). The main priorities are protecting families with children from the tax burden and safeguarding traditional values against "anti-reason" ideology. The overall framing is heavily value-based and condemns the government’s actions, accusing them of violating their oath of office and serving the interests of other groups.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position centers on the practical consequences and procedural expediency of denouncing international treaties. The speaker is concerned about whether terminating the agreement will cause real problems for Estonia, and offers suspending the treaty as an alternative, to avoid the significant effort required to reinstate it later. The argument is primarily policy- and procedure-driven.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly oppositional, centered on calling into question the government's actions and motives. The speaker vehemently opposes the fear-of-war campaign being disseminated on the streets of Tallinn, considering it inappropriate and suspecting that it is a strategic communication project designed to serve the government's interests, aimed at mobilizing the populace through fear given their low approval ratings.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, focusing on the government's inaction regarding economic issues. He/She expresses deep skepticism that the government would take into account important proposals concerning energy prices, tax policies that undermine competitiveness, and over-regulation. The speaker sees a near-zero prospect for the situation to improve while the current government remains in office.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is on the continuity of international security and foreign policy. The speaker criticizes the government's actions, highlighting the contradiction between supporting Ukraine and the continued presence of the Estonian defense forces in Iraq, despite opposition from the local government. This position is value-based, demanding critical self-analysis from the government and the tackling of uncomfortable questions.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The political stance centers on student subsistence and the inadequacy of student loans, which compels students to seek employment. A question is raised regarding whether the current system guarantees optimal academic performance. This represents a policy question specifically focused on effectiveness and outcomes.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance is clearly opposed to the government's tax policy, especially concerning the hike in VAT for accommodation services. It is stressed that the government’s decision to raise the VAT on accommodation establishments to 14% (instead of the general 22%) is illogical and demands an explanation. The focus is on the lack of substance in the policy and the absence of any numerical justification.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is sharply focused on the serious addressing of public concerns and the accountability of agencies (such as the Health Board) in investigating hazardous substances. The speaker opposes the trivialization of these issues and demands that real solutions be found, prioritizing the actions and responsibility of government bodies. This position is strongly oriented toward ensuring effectiveness and public safety.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance heavily emphasizes the government's blatant violation of legislative procedures and the principles of the rule of law. The speaker is fundamentally opposed to the practice of failing to attach constitutional analyses or drafting intentions to proposed bills, labeling this contradiction between ideals and reality as both fundamental and egregious. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on more effectively safeguarding the ideal of the nation-state and the status of the Estonian language, grounded in constitutional obligation. The overall focus is strongly value-based and procedural.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance centers on foreign policy prudence and the ramifications of security decisions. The speaker opposes government actions that knowingly and intentionally escalate tensions in Estonian-Russian relations, unless such steps are absolutely imperative. He questions the necessity of expelling Metropolitan Eugeni, viewing it instead as "harassment and provocation" and a fundamental issue of principle. The political framework is value-driven, emphasizing personal dignity and adherence to principles.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is sharply critical of the government’s activities and the data presented, focusing on two core issues: the concealment of the actual tax burden, and the insufficient investigation and subsequent neglect of serious public health risks (carcinogenic effects) by officials. These positions are aimed at improving performance and increasing transparency. One speaker forcefully disputes the official 33% tax burden figure, while the other urgently calls for attention to the risks.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the mandatory renovation (often referred to as 'forced renovation') imposed by the European Union and the accompanying environmental requirements, emphasizing the protection of individual liberty and property rights. The speaker sharply criticizes the government’s tax hikes and fiscal policy, especially regarding inflation and the residential land tax, viewing these measures as having totalitarian characteristics. The focus is heavily value-driven (freedom, sovereignty) and centered on safeguarding citizens' financial capacity.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus is currently centered on the principles of the rule of law and the accountability of those wielding state power, particularly concerning the actions of the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker strongly supports the strengthening of the service supervision carried out by the Ministry of Justice over the Prosecutor's Office, considering the lack of accountability for abuses of state power to be one of Estonia's fundamental problems. This position is strongly policy-driven and values the principle of official accountability.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker’s position is strongly oppositional and value-based, focusing on three main topics: the effectiveness of aid to Ukraine (border control for men of mobilization age), the Estonian demographic crisis, and government accountability and transparency (Rail Baltic, the Lehtme case). He/She criticizes the government for a lack of willpower and dishonesty, questioning the government’s actual motives (e.g., prioritizing cheap labor). On the issue of demography, the stance is heavily influenced by the values inherent in the survival of the nation-state and the preamble of the constitution.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on addressing a genuine legal loophole in civil status procedures while emphasizing human dignity and the principle of trusting citizens. He sharply criticizes the coalition's practice of simply "trashing" opposition bills, viewing this as a serious problem for parliamentary culture. The speaker maintains that the state should not treat its citizens in a humiliating manner or subject them to pressure based on ideology.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance centers on tax policy, specifically emphasizing the reduction of the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate to 18.8%. This position is strongly supportive and geared toward pushing a specific draft law through, which indicates a policy-driven approach. This constitutes a clearly defined fiscal policy objective.