By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The style of cooperation is evident in the inclusion of external expertise, citing the Estonian Bar Association and the Association of Information Technology and Telecommunications to criticize the government's draft bill. There is no data available regarding inter-party or internal legislative cooperation.

The style of cooperation is demanding and critical, seeking specific answers from ministers and rapporteurs. He/She refers to the previous joint action of three political parties when submitting the bill concerning Children's Protection Day, which demonstrates the potential for cross-party cooperation on social issues.

Not enough data

No data available

The cooperative style is evident in the questions posed to the presenter, who is an expert in the food service industry, as they seek confirmation of the government's unreasonable opposition. There is no information available regarding inter-party or intra-coalition cooperation.

Data on active cooperation during the current session is lacking, but he/she points to earlier broad-based support for the direct presidential election initiative (45 colleagues). It is noted that a certain draft bill lacks the signatures of representatives from two political parties, indicating limited cross-parliamentary cooperation. He/She quotes other politicians (Kata Tüttő, Arvo Aller, the Social Democrats) who share similar positions on regional development and budget matters.

Insufficient data. The speaker is primarily engaged in criticizing the government and raising questions; there are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.

There is little data on the cooperation style, but he/she notes the consensus achieved in the commission regarding both placing the draft on the agenda and concluding the first reading, as well as his/her appointment as representative. This suggests participation in consensual procedural work, even though he/she expresses substantive skepticism.

There is no direct evidence of cooperation or readiness to compromise with the minister; the speaker's style is purely confrontational. The only reference to colleagues is the mention of Aivar Sõerd, who is also struggling with the minister’s materials, pointing to an indirect shared concern.

There is no sign of direct cooperation with the coalition; instead, he emphasizes his disagreement with and opposition to the government's policies. He also points out that other colleagues do not approve of the Tidö agreement, and mentions his role as a member of the parliamentary group for Ukraine.