By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The focus is on the quality of national legislation and international economic relations, inquiring about the level of trade with the Sultanate of Oman. There is no emphasis on specific local or regional issues in Estonia.

The focus is split between national regulation (state land, local municipalities) and international comparison, highlighting EU regulations and Nordic (Swedish) practices. Local government buildings (boiler houses) are mentioned, along with future name change centers (Tallinn, Pärnu, Jõhvi, Haapsalu).

The focus is on both national issues (judicial reform, subsistence/welfare) and specific cultural topics, referencing the Palamuse primer exhibition. The international focus highlights Estonia's close neighbors (Finland, Sweden, Russia) and questions the excessive prominence given to Ukraine in a cultural context, considering Ukraine "a very, very distant country" for Estonian culture.

A strong regional focus is placed on the city of Tartu, supporting its large arena project and referencing its financing from the rental income generated by Tartu Prison. The regional project has been presented as a positive example that warrants implementation.

The focus is on the national level, dealing with general tax policy and its wider impact on the Estonian population. Specific regional issues are not mentioned.

A strong regional focus, which is manifested in opposition to cuts in the EU's cohesion policy, deeming it important for Estonia's regional equilibrium. It emphasizes supporting agriculture (including small and medium-sized production) to ensure the food security of the Estonian people and, through that, physical security as well.

The focus is on national issues (the transition to Estonian-language instruction, VAT on groceries) and international questions (tax agreements with Oman and Liechtenstein, providing aid to Ukraine). Specific local or regional interests are absent.

The focus is primarily on national themes (tax policy, the cost of internet connectivity). Regional focus is demonstrated by the question of whether Põltsamaa and Pajusi meet the definition of "quality space," linking legal provisions to specific small towns in Estonia. The international focus is strong, connecting conventions with the social problems of Iraq, Sri Lanka, and other countries.

The focus is on the national level (the bureaucracy and graphomania of the Estonian state) and international comparison with the practices of Finnish colleagues. Local or regional topics are absent.

The text highlights the extraordinary situation in Elva municipality (Koruste village), where the effects of the war are physically manifest, and uses this as an argument against the criticism from the Minister of the Interior. It also mentions Tartu Prison in connection with the acceptance of international criminals.