By Months: Jaak Aab

The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction regarding the funding of social services and healthcare, particularly concerning the gap between the subsistence level and inflation. The speaker criticizes the policy implementation as reactive and slow, unable to keep pace with real life. The critique is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the consequences (the lengthening of waiting lists), but avoids personal attacks.

The primary confrontation is with the government, with criticism focusing particularly on the ambiguous decisions made by the Minister of Education and Research and the budget policies of the Minister of Finance. This criticism is policy-driven, centering on the failure to deliver on promises and the creation of a budget deficit resulting from the abolition of the tax hump. Furthermore, the speaker defends the Social Democratic Party, refuting the accusations made concerning the motor vehicle tax.

Sharply criticizes the Centre Party for abandoning regional policy, labeling it a "municipal party." The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the government's nuclear energy plans, questioning whether the state is essentially "playing the lottery." A critical question is posed to the Prime Minister concerning the campaign aimed at reducing bureaucracy. The criticism is primarily policy-centric, rather than personal.

The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and Eesti 200 over recent policy changes, accusing them of lacking principles and operating under the influence of lobbyists. They express strong opposition to amending the Competition Act in its current form, labeling the proposed changes as merely serving the interests of monopolies. Furthermore, the government is accused of disregarding expert recommendations regarding labor and tax policy.

He/She sharply criticizes the government formed by the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of weakening competition oversight and protecting the interests of large corporations. It is claimed that the government "punishes consumers and entrepreneurs with high prices." The text highlights the Reform Party's sluggishness in making energy decisions, specifically mentioning delays in maritime spatial planning and radar procurements. They demand the rejection of the draft legislation and greater transparency in decision-making processes.

Delivers sharp criticism of Isamaa’s energy policy, accusing them of inconsistency and "erratic policy." Cites specific examples of Isamaa’s previous decisions that harmed consumers (the universal service). The opposition is principled but focuses on the substance of the policy, not personal attacks.

The text criticizes the Reform Party for obstructing the draft competition law and directly questions why the Ministers of Justice (who are primarily Reform Party members) have been unable to resolve the issue. It expresses suspicion that certain businesses may be hindering the enhancement of competition oversight. At the same time, it maintains a constructive approach by seeking solutions.

There is no direct confrontation evident in the speeches. The speaker instead constructively acknowledges the problems, such as the unprofitability of oil shale power on the market, but avoids blaming specific parties. He emphasizes the necessity of keeping existing capacities operational until superior alternatives can be identified.