By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The collaborative style indicates an openness to involving academic experts (political scientists, biologists), even though this proposal did not receive approval from the commission. He/She also refers to cooperation with national-conservative youth (Sinine Äratus), whose negative opinion regarding the draft bill was sent to the commission.

Insufficient data

Insufficient data.

The cooperation style is pragmatic because support is expressed for the bill under discussion, specifically by calling it good. Furthermore, the faction leader is referenced, which indicates the coordination and unity of the internal faction's position.

Cooperation is demonstrated with a colleague (Moonika Helm), with whom concerns are shared regarding the capability of the Security Police Board. Communication with the minister is confrontational and demanding, focusing on obtaining answers rather than seeking compromise. He/She represents a group of interpellators, which indicates intra-factional cooperation.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cross political boundaries to support a shared critical stance, stating that they are momentarily embodying a coalition representative in support of Kadri Tali. This indicates pragmatic cooperation on specific issues.

The speaker references the Riigikogu support group, which was established to define the needs of the higher education reform, thereby demonstrating an understanding of collaborative structures. However, personal willingness to compromise or cooperate with the minister is not apparent, given that the speaker is adopting a sharply critical stance.

The speaker is prepared for technical collaboration, noting that corrections were made to the original draft text with Ants Frosch to highlight an embarrassing mistake. This shows a readiness to contribute constructively to the committee's work, even if they do not endorse the statement in its entirety.