By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The speaker participated in the Constitutional Committee's discussion, where they proposed involving external experts (political scientists, demographers). At the plenary session, they presented their party's arguments against the draft bill and ultimately proposed rejecting the bill.

Insufficient data.

The pattern of action demonstrates persistence and consistency in handling certain topics, as the speaker is repeating a question they posed to the Prime Minister a month ago. This points to systematic monitoring of issues and holding the government accountable.

Based on the data, the speaker appeared at the plenary session of the Riigikogu on a single day, May 14th. The faction chairman's earlier position is noted, which points to coordinated activity within the faction.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, submitting an interpellation and questions to the Minister of the Interior. They utilize parliamentary procedures (the interpellation) to hold the government accountable and demand clarity, serving as the representative of those submitting the inquiry. They seek to bring clarity to the confusion that has arisen in the public sphere.

The pattern of activity is restricted to submitting two consecutive questions during the plenary session on a single day, consistently focusing on the issue of confidence in e-voting.

The pattern of action involves the sharp questioning of ministers' activities and political decisions during the plenary session of the Riigikogu. The questions focus both on recent events (the minister's repeated visits) and on long-term systemic problems (the lack of higher education reform).

The member is active during the Riigikogu's plenary sessions, posing pointed questions to the rapporteurs. They also participate in committee work, where they are involved in amending the original texts of the draft legislation.