By Agendas: Kristo Enn Vaga

Total Agendas: 32

Fully Profiled: 32

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal, respectful, and cooperative, starting with an expression of gratitude to the chairman and the acknowledgment of Martinson's idea. The address mainly consists of detailed, policy-oriented questions that require technical clarification. A logical and constructive approach is preferred.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu ("Extension of the Term of Use of the Defence Forces in the Implementation of Estonia's International Obligations in a Post-Conflict Peacekeeping Operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria") (711 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is official, informative, and procedural, focusing on the communication of the decisions and procedural course of the National Defence Committee. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on facts, consensus, and legislative correctness, utilizing phrases such as "according to established practice."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) "Use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations as part of the United Kingdom's joint expeditionary force" (707 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The style of the address is formal, informative, and procedural, fitting the role of a representative of the National Defence Committee. Emphasis is placed on a logical and fact-based presentation, highlighting both strategic rationales and the consensus decisions reached by the committee. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the focus is strictly on clarifying the procedure and the underlying background.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical. The speaker begins with strong compliments directed at the expert, highlighting the substance and professionalism of their presentations. The focus is placed on posing specific, substantive economic questions, while avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Second reading of the draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is serious and insistent, underscoring the critical importance of readiness, with direct reference to the painful lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. It employs both logical argumentation (the substance of the draft bill) and emotional appeal (saving lives and mutual assistance). The discourse is formal, concentrating on policy implementation and the swift handling of legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the chair of the session and the chairman of the Constitutional Committee. The speech is logical and fact-based, focusing on the provisions of the law and posing an analytical question regarding the legal consequence, while avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The tone is urgent, serious, and persuasive, emphasizing Russia's long-term threat and the necessity of action. It utilizes both logical arguments (specific investments and budget figures) and emotional appeals (thanking the public for their efforts, highlighting the price of freedom). The style is formal, detailed, and aimed at both colleagues and the general public.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to initiate proceedings in the European Union to invalidate the obligation to prepare sustainability reports" (601 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is confrontational and didactic, often starting with the phrase, "I will now enlighten you a little bit." Logical and procedural arguments are employed, referencing facts and previous decisions in order to discredit the opposing side. The tone is predominantly dismissive, accusing the opposition of "battering down an open door."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act (589 SE) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is sharp, procedural, and at times confrontational, focusing on adherence to order and rules. The speaker employs direct criticism toward a colleague, accusing them of failing to read the draft legislation and of dishonesty. The appeals are primarily logical and procedural, demanding intervention from the presiding officer.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act (589 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is formal, procedural, and explanatory, typical of a commission rapporteur. The arguments are primarily logical and fact-based, citing consensus decisions and risk analyses. It strives to explain complex subjects also in simple, "layman's terms" language to ensure comprehensibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is polite and analytical, beginning with a strong expression of thanks for the minister's presentation ("for a very thorough and forward-looking presentation"). The speaker poses a complex procedural question, using formal language and focusing on the logical consideration of institutional structures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act (589 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is official, procedural, and neutral, fitting the role of the committee rapporteur in the Riigikogu. The speaker relies on logical arguments and facts (such as committee sessions and the objective of the law) and refrains from emotional appeals. They are prepared to answer questions and acknowledge the limits of their knowledge regarding specific details, promising to provide the necessary data later.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act (585 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The tone of the address is formal, respectful, and constructive. The speaker begins by thanking the Minister and the Chair of the session, recognizing the importance of the bill. The appeal itself is logical, focusing on enhancing the law through ensuring clarity, and strictly avoids emotional or personal appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The style is combative and critical, employing sarcasm and personal attacks against the opponent ("windmill style," "I generally sleep quite well"). Strong logical arguments and data (budget figures, NATO rankings) are presented to justify the government's actions. The tone is confident and emphasizes the government's achievements.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is confident, substantive, and strongly evidence-based, beginning with direct fact-checking against the claims made by political opponents. The tone is serious and persuasive, utilizing logical argumentation and extensive numerical examples regarding the development of defense capabilities. The speech concludes with a call to action for the people of Estonia and businesses to contribute to the nation’s defense.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution (486 OE) of the Riigikogu regarding the extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a post-conflict peacekeeping operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, characteristic of the rapporteur for the steering committee. The discourse is logic-based, focusing on the presentation of facts, the dates of the sessions, and decisions reached by consensus. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis is placed on procedural correctness and transparency.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the Republic of Estonia's international obligations as part of the United Kingdom's joint expeditionary force" (483 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style is formal, procedural, and informative, characteristic of a committee rapporteur. The tone is moderate and respectful, acknowledging colleagues, and emphasizes logical appeal, repeatedly referencing consensus decisions and the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. The speaker is prepared to answer any questions, but strictly limits the discussion to the framework of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
The second reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia’s international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation, upon its initial contribution"

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, objective, and focuses on clarifying facts. The speaker emphasizes their goal as "clarification for the sake of the protocol," using logical argumentation and avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is polite and collegial.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Weapons Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (468 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is optimistic, constructive, and formal, focusing on logical arguments and the meticulous explanation of political solutions. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of swift action during crises and the positive impact of reducing bureaucratic hurdles. Instead of emotional appeals, a factual enumeration of the bill's benefits is employed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution (486 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in a post-conflict peacekeeping operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Syria."

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, informative, and procedural, fitting the role of a representative of the National Defence Committee. The tone is positive and moderate, emphasizing the constructiveness and consensus of the discussions. The appeals are purely logical, focusing on facts, dates, and procedural decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations as part of the United Kingdom's joint expeditionary force" (483 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style is highly formal, businesslike, and procedural, focusing on the reporting of the work of the Riigikogu Committee. The speaker employs a logical and neutral tone, respectfully addressing the Chairman of the Riigikogu and the Minister. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed solely on conveying facts and procedural decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The style is formal and respectful, yet simultaneously optimistic regarding Estonia's ongoing success within the EU, transitioning to a pressing tone that emphasizes responsibility when addressing security issues. Historical references are employed ("Europe, we are here!") and Estonia's role in shaping Europe is highlighted ("Europe is us"). The appeals blend logical arguments (economic data, market expansion) with value-based calls for collective defense.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (426 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The style is formal, procedural, and informative, as the speaker is fulfilling the role of rapporteur for the leading committee. The tone is positive and persuasive, emphasizing the necessity of the law and its swift entry into force, referring to the bill as "a very good draft." The argumentation is primarily logical, relying on procedural facts, the committee’s consensus decisions, and legal deadlines.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Bank of Estonia 2023 Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, utilizing respectful forms of address ("Dear Deputy Speaker of the Riigikogu! Esteemed President of the Bank of Estonia!"). The discourse is logical and focuses on assessing the potential of specific financial instruments, while avoiding emotional appeals. The objective is to obtain an expert assessment regarding the feasibility and advantages of the political proposal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is optimistic, constructive, and collegial, expressing satisfaction that the bill has reached its final phase and addressing the audience as "Honorable colleagues." The speech centers on logically explaining the political changes, highlighting improved safety and the establishment of new regulations. Instead of emotional appeals, a fact-based explanation of the law's content and objectives is used.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First Reading of the Bill for the Act Amending the Emergency Situation Act and Related Acts (426 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The style is formal, procedural, and informative, typical of a commission rapporteur. The speaker focuses on logical explanation, referencing the commission's discussions, questions, and consensus decisions, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is professional and constructive, aimed at ensuring the smooth processing of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, including an expression of gratitude to the presenter for the excellent overview. However, the tone is also urgent, emphasizing the critical nature of the security situation, which demands immediate action. Logical argumentation is used, offering concrete financial solutions that would also benefit the economy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is optimistic, constructive, and formal, focusing on presenting political solutions and acknowledging existing initiatives. The speaker balances logical arguments (a quick return on investment) with emotional elements (the unifying power of medals in society, the example of Erika Salumäe). Numerous specific examples and data points (e.g., Panevėžys, 3 million euros) are employed to justify the necessity of supporting infrastructure and major events.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Third Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (337 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal yet passionate and mobilizing, underscoring the vital importance of aiding Ukraine. It utilizes both emotional appeals ("Long live Estonia! Long live Ukraine!") and concrete data (studies, aid sums) to support its stance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (274 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare and Restore a Militarized Border Guard as a Separate Agency"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The style of address is extremely formal, objective, and procedural, focusing on the detailed reporting of the work of the National Defence Committee and the legislative process of the draft bill. The speaker employs institutional and legally precise language, mentioning procedural decisions and obstructionist amendments. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on the logical and factual conveyance of information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive. Both speakers begin by commending the Foreign Minister, which sets a constructive tone. The emphasis is on logical and political argumentation, focusing on obtaining an overview of the current status of specific processes (consultations, EU decision-making).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Substitute Enforcement and Penalty Payment Act and Other Acts (Bill 340 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker's style is extremely formal, procedural, and report-oriented, fulfilling the role of a rapporteur. The tone is neutral and objective, relying entirely on facts, dates, and procedural decisions. Emotional or rhetorical appeals are absent; the focus remains solely on summarizing the work of the National Defence Committee.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling