By Months: Madis Timpson
Total Months: 12
Fully Profiled: 12
10.2025
2 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, fitting the role of the committee rapporteur. The tone focuses on legal and procedural matters, relying on logical arguments and the provisions of the code. There is a brief, mildly ironic political aside directed at Reform Party member Epler, but this does not dominate the overall presentation.
09.2025
16 Speeches
The style is formal, analytical, and argumentative, utilizing both strong value-based appeals (freedom, ethics) and detailed procedural reporting. The tone is generally serious and respectful, often referencing the Constitution and the positions of the Chancellor of Justice. There is also a sharp personal remark directed at the opponent (Reinsalu) and critical metaphors (thought police, word warden).
06.2025
8 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly formal and procedural, especially when presenting commission reports. In his personal statements, however, he is direct and defensive, calling the opposition's motion of no confidence "intellectually modest" and "inadequate." He favors logical arguments and reliance on facts (e.g., the decline in system efficiency, the revenue potential of prisons), while simultaneously employing emotional appeals (people getting jobs to feed their families).
05.2025
5 Speeches
The style is formal, respectful, and question-oriented, always addressing the recipient as "Respected Minister." The speaker employs logical arguments to highlight deficiencies (such as the growth of administrative burden or the risk of the statute of limitations expiring) and demands concrete plans or figures (for example, the cost of inmate maintenance). The speaker is analytical and emphasizes historical context to support their positions.
04.2025
4 Speeches
The style is highly formal and respectful, including repeated expressions of gratitude for the presentations ("Thank you very much for the presentation!"). At the same time, direct and critical questions are raised regarding the government's actions, especially concerning the potential for legal violations. The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and the demand for concrete plans.
03.2025
4 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly formal, neutral, and procedural, acting primarily as a rapporteur who provides an overview of the committee discussions. They balance various viewpoints (including both the ministry's explanations and criticism from colleagues) and focus on logical, fact-based summaries rather than emotional appeals.
01.2025
4 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal, analytical, and procedural, focusing on the conveyance of facts and the results of the commission's work. The tone is neutral and informative, steering clear of emotional appeals. The speaker employs logical arguments and references specific figures and legal details, speaking in the capacity of a rapporteur.
12.2024
12 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, straightforward, and highly explanatory, particularly when refuting opponents' claims ("It will not be legalized!"). The speaker relies on logical arguments, citing laws, records, and procedural decisions, while simultaneously stressing constructiveness and adherence to the topic boundaries. They use repeated assurances (for example, the substance of gender reassignment will not change) with the aim of dispelling doubts and fears.
11.2024
8 Speeches
The speaker's style is formal, businesslike, and procedural, especially when acting as a committee rapporteur, where the emphasis is placed on strict neutrality and reporting what happened, rather than introducing personal opinion. The appeals are logical and fact-based, focusing on the procedural progress of the draft legislation, legal correctness, and cost optimization. In political debate, a tone that is appreciative yet directive is employed, inviting colleagues to unite behind the broad-based bill in order to send the best signal.
10.2024
23 Speeches
The speaker’s style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing exclusively on the factual reporting of events within the committee. He/She frequently employs parliamentary terminology ("procedural decisions," "consensus-based," "leading committee") and repeatedly declines to offer a personal opinion, even when pressured by party colleagues, strictly defending his/her role. The tone is calm but resolute, particularly when drawing attention to the incorrect addressee or timing of questions.
09.2024
14 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal, factual, and analytical, particularly when they serve as the committee's rapporteur. In this capacity, they repeatedly emphasize that their role is to convey the committee's discussions, not their personal views. When personal opinions are offered (e.g., opposition to progressive income tax), the tone is specific and direct. They frequently reference their previous professional roles to underscore their competence.
07.2024
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is extremely formal and ceremonial, utilizing respectful forms of address ("Honored President!", "Respected Chairman of the Session"). The speech is brief, direct, and focuses on the fulfillment of procedural duty.