By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The style is formal and respectful, utilizing forms of address such as "Mr. Chairman" and "Esteemed Minister." One speaker starts with praise to establish a positive atmosphere, while the other uses a rhetorical question to highlight the risk of misusing taxpayer funds. The appeals are primarily logical and procedural.

The style is confident and partially partisan, containing strong praise for the Reform Party. The tone is formal ("Mr. Chairman," "dear rapporteur"), and the speech concludes with a specific and direct question regarding salary optimization.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the presiding officer and the minister. The rhetoric balances a brief, positive social comment regarding children with specific, logical, and procedural questions concerning the position of the Chancellor of Justice and the costs incurred by the state.

The rhetorical style is formal, informative, and highly explanatory, particularly when dealing with sensitive subjects. The speaker employs repetition to mitigate concerns (for example, regarding gender transition), stressing that no substantive changes will be implemented. The tone is measured and focuses on logical reasoning, urging colleagues to remain within the scope of the topic and their mandates to ensure constructive work.

The rhetorical style is defensive and rational, focusing on clarifying facts and refuting counterarguments ("The claim simply doesn't hold water"). Formal and detailed language is employed, introducing specific legal citations and contact information to underscore the logical basis of the arguments. The speaker contrasts their concise, fact-based approach with the opponents' tendency to "passionately miss the mark."