By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

One speaker adopts a collaborative style, commending the minister for the work accomplished on the bill aimed at accelerating criminal proceedings, signaling a willingness to recognize positive developments. The second speaker, however, shows no sign of cooperation, focusing instead on critical oversight.

There is too little data.

The cooperation style is formal and information-seeking, presenting the Minister with specific questions regarding ratification and the associated legal and financial risks. The communication is polite and focuses on facts.

The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive. The speaker emphasizes that all important procedural decisions within the committee were made by consensus. External cooperation included an engagement event, to which institutions playing a significant role were invited, such as the Society of Family Physicians and the Association of Cities and Rural Municipalities.

The speaker pointed to cooperation within the committee, where the draft bill was clarified following the interruption of the reading, thereby demonstrating a willingness for procedural refinement. The primary focus, however, remains on defending the stance of their own party (the Reform Party) and correcting the mistakes made by the opposition.