By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The style is formal, objective, and informative, focusing on a neutral summary of the commission's work and decisions. The speaker employs a logical structure, referencing the positions of agencies and avoiding emotional appeals, in order to spare the audience from legal-theoretical disputes. The tone is businesslike and procedural.

The rhetorical style is defensive and highly argumentative, employing logical counterarguments and international examples to mitigate panic. The tone is critical and occasionally superior, dismissing the opposition's arguments as weak and intellectually shallow. It utilizes rhetorical questions and emphasizes personal experience (as a former Minister of Justice) to bolster its claims.

The style is strictly formal, neutral, and concise, focusing on conveying the substance of the commission meeting minutes and discussion. The speaker employs a logical, point-by-point structure to highlight the topics debated and questions raised by colleagues, while avoiding emotional or personal viewpoints.

The tone is analytical and matter-of-fact, emphasizing the need for quick decisions ("at some point, you need to draw a line and move forward"). The speaker uses logical arguments, relying on facts (e.g., the decline in system efficiency) and personal experience (being an employer). The style is formal, while also including blunt assessments, for example, judges' resources must not be wasted on "fluff" or "trivialities."

The rhetorical style is formal and polite, starting with an address to the Chair and the presenter. The speaker uses a question format to draw attention to a specific, high-contrast example (€1830 vs €5000), emphasizing the need for a relevant solution.