By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The style of discourse is predominantly formal, fact-based, and detailed, especially when relaying the content of the committee meeting, where a methodical and neutral tone is employed. Regarding the issue of regional development, the tone is respectful but purposeful, seeking concrete measures from the minister. Instead of emotional appeals, the focus remains on logical and procedural argumentation.

The style is predominantly formal, respectful, and explanatory. One speaker uses personal legal experience (I am a lawyer myself) to support criticism regarding the legal terminology. The second speaker is strictly procedural and authoritative, focusing on the logical presentation of the bill's history, legal contradictions, and the objectives of the amendments.

The style is very formal and procedural, especially when presenting the commission report, focusing on the transmission of facts and the positions of other participants. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes their neutral role, refusing to express personal views to avoid distorting the commission's debate. The language is detailed and often refers back to the protocol and the pre-submitted materials.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, commencing with an expression of gratitude to the minister for the presentation. Questions subsequently become very specific, focusing on data (job forecasts) or procedural details (the effective date). The tone is professional and centers on logical and policy-based discussion.