By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The style is formal, structured, and focuses on the detailed reporting of facts from the committee discussions, noting who asked what and who responded. The tone is neutral and procedural, becoming slightly defensive when accused of absence or of concealing a personal opinion. It uses logical appeals, relying on protocols, voting results, and the recollection of exactly what was addressed in the committee.

The style is formal and courteous, addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur with respect. The tone is inquisitive and procedural, focusing on the logical explanation and the facts concerning the bill's previous failure. Direct questions are employed, requiring a concise and fact-based response.

The style of discourse is formal, neutral, and procedural. Short, fact-heavy sentences are used to convey the commission's consensus decision. Emotional or rhetorical devices are absent; the emphasis is placed on logical reasoning (the need to discuss the topic further).

The style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing exclusively on the transmission of discussions and decisions made within the committee. The speaker refrains from expressing personal opinions to maintain the role of rapporteur, utilizing a logical and fact-based approach. The tone is objective and referential, relying on the figures and slides provided by the minister and experts.