By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The political position is primarily procedural and informative, focusing on reporting the progress of three draft bills (EU obligations, medicine reserves, state fees). He/She emphasizes his/her role as a presenter of facts, repeatedly refusing to share a personal opinion, arguing that it falls outside the scope of a co-rapporteur’s duties. His/Her focus is therefore more policy-based and procedural, ensuring the smoothness and legality of the legislative process.

It focuses on the legislative procedure and the bill's previous progress in the Riigikogu. The political stance is inquisitive, attempting to understand why the bill previously failed to gain support and whether new circumstances justify its resubmission. The approach is procedural rather than value-based.

The focus is on the procedural correctness of Bill 427 concerning the social sector. The political stance aims to suspend the second reading to ensure a thorough discussion of the issue within the committee. This position is procedure-focused and moderately supportive of achieving thoroughness.

The focus is on the political framework governing the financing of social and healthcare services and the subsequent impacts of the care reform. As a rapporteur, the speaker maintains strict procedural and fact-based neutrality, emphasizing the consensus achieved within the committee. The main emphasis is on the policy details and advancing the draft legislation. The overall approach is heavily procedural.