By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The discourse is formal and procedural, focusing on detailed summaries of commission deliberations, questions posed, and ministry clarifications. The tone regarding political matters is conciliatory, avoiding reproach, but resolute in legislative decisions, relying on logical and fact-based reporting. Frequent references are made to consensus and procedural stages.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and fact-based, focusing on the detailed reporting of the commission's work. The speaker emphasizes strict procedural correctness and refuses to offer a personal opinion, citing the legal acts that govern the role of the rapporteur.

The address is formal, constructive, and highly logical, focusing on a detailed explanation of the draft legislation's background, the legal issues involved, and the proposed solution. The tone is positive and collaborative, emphasizing the effectiveness of inter-institutional work. The arguments presented are primarily factual and procedural.