By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The stance toward opponents is generally conciliatory, avoiding personal criticism while acknowledging the Isamaa Party for raising the topic. However, on the legislative front, there is clear opposition to the Isamaa Party's constitutional amendment bill, and support is given to its rejection in the interest of procedural clarity.

There is no direct political opposition; the speaker neutrally relays the concerns raised by interest groups (e.g., the Chamber of People with Disabilities, the Nurses' Union) and the representative of the Chancellor of Justice regarding the bill’s impact. The criticism is aimed at the details of the policy and potential negative consequences, not at individuals.

The speaker does not criticize any political opponent or group. The only issue addressed is the inconsistency in the legal framework, which the National Audit Office highlighted.