By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

Strong opposition is directed at the political and administrative system that defends the continuation of e-voting, a system represented by "judges, officials, and politicians," collectively referred to as "the wall." The criticism is systemic and directly questions whether change is possible regardless of public opinion. It also criticizes the presenter for either lacking an opinion or lacking the courage to express it.

The main targets of criticism are the Chancellor and a department head at the Ministry of Climate, who are accused of lying to members of the Riigikogu and concealing funding information. Furthermore, he/she sharply criticizes the session chair for inappropriately intervening in and controlling the parliamentary debate. He/She is strongly opposed to the government’s economic and energy policies, which are impoverishing the country.

The criticism is aimed more at procedural inefficiency and indecisiveness in governing the country, rather than targeting specific political opponents. There is fear that the debates could drag on indefinitely, signaling dissatisfaction with the current pace of national governance.

Criticism is aimed at the working methods and potential political bias of the Prosecutor's Office, raising questions about the timing of the proceedings. A specific political opponent, Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa), is singled out, with questions being raised about the sources of his knowledge and references made to his alleged fumbling.

The main opposition is directed at the "European technocrats" who subordinate national governments, as well as the Estonian government itself. Criticism is aimed specifically at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the deficiencies in her security control, which stem from a legal loophole. The resistance is intense, suggesting that Kallas continuing in office caused great outrage among 80% of the Estonian population.

The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and the prime minister, accusing them of implementing tax policies that make life difficult for rural residents and families. The Riigikogu board is also criticized for engaging in political retribution and restricting the rights of MPs when handling interpellations. Furthermore, the prime minister’s trustworthiness is being questioned regarding his explanations of political and media goals.

The opposition is aimed at the government and top politicians (Minister Michal, the Secretary General of the Ministry of Climate, a Socialist minister), who are being accused of incompetence, ignoring the reality hidden behind their slogans, and outright lying. The criticism is intense and focuses on political decisions that impede industrial investments and undermine competitiveness. The speaker also criticizes the bureaucratic hurdles resulting from these political decisions.

The criticism targets political shortcomings and unjust financial models, particularly the absence of a legal framework guaranteeing the utilization requirement for renewable energy. Concern is also raised regarding the "stripping bare" (or outright theft) of Estonia's national aviation sector and the ensuing damage to its reputation. Furthermore, it criticizes the potential risk of "optimizing" compensation within the sick leave system.

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government’s energy policy. The criticism is sharp, focusing both on political choices (causing the high cost of living) and the Prime Minister’s rhetorical inconsistencies, the selection of sources, and alleged dishonesty in interpreting the transcript. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the emphasis is placed on exposing the errors of the opposing side.

The primary criticism is leveled against the government and the minister, who favor wind and solar power, and against the media, who are accused of spreading negative narratives or outright lying. The criticism is policy- and substance-based, specifically concerning the lack of energy security and industrial development. The speaker rejects the colleague's suggestion that something (other than nuclear energy) should be done in the interim, and, on behalf of the faction, moves to reject the draft bill.

The primary opposition target is the ruling coalition and the prime minister, who face fierce criticism over political decisions (such as abandoning the bank tax and implementing new tax hikes) and ethical concerns (like the influence wielded by bank executives). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of strangling the Estonian economy and dipping into the pockets of families with children. While answers are expected, the government representative's responses are sometimes viewed as a deliberate refusal to engage with provocation.