By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The speaker is a strong advocate for the elderly and families with children, emphasizing the necessity of ensuring their dignity and sense of security. They oppose measures that worsen the situation of expectant mothers and young children (such as the doctor's visit co-pay) and harshly criticize the termination of social tax payments for non-working parents, viewing this as a negative signal during a demographic crisis.

The text emphasizes the crucial importance of family values, close relationships, and mental balance, all of which are essential for maintaining one's personal life and health. It criticizes the culture of constant competition and career-centrism that is deeply ingrained in Estonian society, a culture which often overlooks the necessity of rest. While mentioning its Christian background and the principle of the Sabbath, it stresses that it prioritizes supporting rest primarily due to its social and health benefits.

In the social sphere, the importance of consumer protection is emphasized (using the example of interest rate caps on quick loans), contrasting this with the severity of the proposed car tax. Regarding healthcare issues, it is stressed that inefficient inventory systems increase overall costs and reduce the funds available for patient treatment.

Among the social issues discussed is the restriction of voting rights, which is closely tied to matters of security and citizenship/integration. It is emphasized that individuals who have not sought Estonian citizenship over the course of 30 years should not possess the right to vote for decision-making bodies. This position is strongly justified by citing the support shown by these individuals for the president of the aggressive neighboring state.

In social policy discussions, emphasis is placed on the necessity of maintaining support for vulnerable pensioners (those in general and special care), as they cannot advocate for themselves. Cuts made at the expense of children and families (specifically funding for extracurricular activities) are criticized, as these cuts make rural life impossible for young families. The overall objective is to ensure social protection and a sense of security for everyone.