By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The collaborative style demonstrates a willingness to acknowledge positive results by thanking the Social Affairs Committee and its Chair, Karmen Joller, for introducing the amendment concerning pregnant women. This indicates a readiness to cooperate in solving specific social issues, even if the general attitude toward the draft legislation remains strongly oppositional.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
They actively support draft legislation initiated by others (such as the bill concerning public holidays) and express agreement with the views of their colleagues. They reference their cooperation within the Tallinn City Council, where they successfully worked with coalition partners to stop the increase in land tax. The description of this cooperation also contains criticism directed at a specific statement made by a coalition colleague (Pärtel-Peeter Pere).
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker mentions private communication with Aivar Koka, a member of the Isamaa party, suggesting informed interaction with other factions. However, the official debate focuses on sharp opposition to government representatives, and no willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they call for the draft bill to be rejected.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is conditionally approving, praising the Prime Minister for his sense of responsibility and initiative regarding the question of voting rights. At the same time, broad-based responsibility is demanded, with a call to include all Riigikogu parties in the discussions. The speaker emphasizes that Isamaa is ready for cooperation but will not make concessions on fundamental issues of value.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker praises the Regional Minister for answering honestly, politely, and without condescension, while making an effort to understand those asking the questions. However, there is no direct mention of cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the fundamental opposition to the government's activities is stressed.