By Months: Riina Sikkut

The criticism is directed at the minister's inaction or the delegation of responsibility to local municipalities regarding the mitigation of educational inequality. The speaker sharply questions the state's guidelines and proactiveness, criticizing a passive approach that leads to school closures. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.

The speaker is sharply critical of the government, accusing it of favoring the wealthy in its tax policy and drafting an irresponsible budget. They also criticize the Reform Party's stance on wage criteria and the failure of ministers (including Erkki Keldo and the regional minister) to present concrete metrics. While the criticism is primarily policy-based, it also includes personal accusations of demagoguery and the use of erroneous figures.

The main opponents are the coalition parties and specific ministers (Minister of Justice Liisa Pakosta and the Minister of Finance), who are being criticized for their priority setting and incompetent handling of procedures. The process of handling the Competition Act is sharply criticized, being labeled as "embarrassing" and "odd." The government is also accused of postponing unpopular decisions (regarding budget sustainability) until after the 2027 elections.

The speaker sharply criticizes the government's political choices, particularly its tax policy and environmental decisions, accusing them of unfairness and a lack of strategic, holistic vision. He/She takes a stand against conservative colleagues (e.g., Varro Vooglaid, Helle-Moonika Helme) on issues of gender equality, labeling their views as prejudiced. The criticism is primarily focused on policy and values, avoiding personal attacks (for instance, emphasizing collegiality in the Kert Kingo case).

The criticism is primarily aimed at political opponents and the government’s actions concerning worker protection (the Employment Contracts Act) and strategic planning (ENMAK). He/She also criticizes the Minister of Finance (Jürgen Ligi) for his personal skepticism regarding the gender equality directive. Most sharply, he/she takes a stand against those who spread terrifying information about the health effects of wind energy that lacks an evidence base.

The opposition is aimed at the proponents handling the specific draft bill, who are being criticized for procedural violations and improper wording. The speaker accuses them of having a hidden motive to reconfigure the electorate, as well as showing disregard for Estonia's internal peace and negligence concerning social cohesion.