By Plenary Sessions: Riina Sikkut

The speaker is fiercely critical of the government's tax policy, which raises both VAT and income tax, denouncing it as an unjust burden on low-income earners. The speaker also criticizes those who oppose gender balance regulations, dismissing such objections (for example, those raised by Varro Vooglaid) as inappropriate, and defending the state-mandated rules as necessary and suitable.

A strong opposition stance is aimed at the government and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, criticizing their tax policy decisions and the misinterpretation of IMF recommendations. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of adopting unfair, growth-undermining measures and breaking its promise of tax peace.

The speaker sharply criticizes the government's procedural irregularities, faulting them for initiating the designation of targeted protection zones without first amending the relevant legislation. He also criticizes the inconsistency of the government's tax policy and the frequent changes made over the last four years. The criticism is aimed at the fundamental principles underlying both policy and procedure.

No opposition is voiced; the address is directed at the minister and focuses on finding solutions to education issues. The criticism is aimed more at systemic shortcomings (poor exam results) rather than specific political opponents.

The speaker criticizes those who systematically raise topics like transgenderism or "quotas for Black homosexuals," viewing these issues as a distraction from the discussion. He/She opposes those who consider women in leadership positions less competent, accusing them of holding prejudiced attitudes that impede the advancement of qualified women.

The primary confrontation is aimed squarely at the policies of the minister and the government, specifically criticizing the disregard shown toward the Competition Authority and the changes being made to regional policy plans. The criticism is focused on policy and accountability, escalating to the question of the minister's resignation should the transposition of the directive fail. Initially, a sharp contrast is also drawn with Varro Vooglaid, implying that the Social Democrats are the only ones truly defending democracy and the rule of law.