By Plenary Sessions: Riina Sikkut

The main opponent is the Minister of Justice and the government, whose priorities are strange and illogical. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax cuts for casinos) and at the Minister’s unethical behavior, who gave the impression that the speaker had supported the leasing of prisons. The speaker urgently demands the opportunity to refute the "lies" spread by the Minister.

The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) and specific ministers (Kaja Kallas, Lea Danilson-Järg, Margus Tsahkna, Liisa Pakosta). Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax hikes) and procedural unreliability (accusations of stalling the Competition Act, and Prime Minister Kristen Michal breaking promises regarding the tax moratorium). The opposition is intense, manifesting in proposals to halt the reading of draft bills.

Strong opposition is aimed at the government, and particularly the Eesti 200 party, who stand accused of obstructing restrictions on consumer credit advertising and politically overemphasizing competition law. The criticism is rooted in both policy and ethics, alleging that the government is protecting business interests rather than those of consumers. This opposition is intense and uncompromising.

The criticism targets the existing economic model and decision-making processes that have prioritized foreign capital and resulted in low value-added exports. The opposition is aimed at policies that fail to account for the needs of local businesses and are unable to translate the potential of education into economic success.

The criticism is aimed at colleagues who presented inadequate proposals or demonstrated a lack of nuance in assessing security threats. Helir-Valdor Seeder was criticized specifically; his statement was called "customarily very one-dimensional and insensitive to nuance" due to his disregard for the change in the threat assessment. Kalle Grünthal's proposal to use mines without withdrawing from the convention was also rejected.

The opposition is focused on the coalition's plan to introduce special car tax provisions for families with children, criticizing its complexity and the high cost of implementation within a short timeframe. Furthermore, the Centre Party is being criticized for breaking a previous promise regarding cooperation with EKRE, underscoring the lack of trust.

The main opponents are the minister, whose political framework (infrastructure is not politics) he/she strongly criticizes, and the prime minister, who does not support evidence-based solutions for improving road safety. The criticism is aimed at political indecisiveness and the deviation from established goals, while being policy-based in its essence.

The main criticism is directed at the government’s fiscal policy, accusing them of postponing unpopular decisions for political reasons (the 2027 elections). The previous Center Party-led Tallinn city government is also criticized for hindering the consolidation of hospitals. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, highlighting suboptimal management.