By Plenary Sessions: Riina Sikkut

The speeches were delivered during a plenary session, most likely as part of a debate on a motion of no confidence or an interpellation. The speaker references their prior involvement in cabinet discussions and private conversations with the minister, emphasizing their consistently critical stance regarding the prison lease.

The speaker is highly active in plenary sessions, addressing several important legislative proposals within a short timeframe (two days), including submitting motions to suspend readings. He/She references participation in coalition negotiations and Finance Committee meetings (e.g., a meeting with the IMF). The speaker handles both substantive and technical matters (e.g., the Botswana double taxation treaty, specific details of the Song Festival Act).

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, posing a series of consecutive questions to both the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Minister, focusing on the oversight of legislation and justice issues. This pattern of engagement demonstrates a deep immersion in complex legal and political controversies.

Insufficient data

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu plenary session, taking part in the final vote on a crucial security policy decision. They mention that over the past month and a half, they have received a large number of inquiries in both Estonian and English from organizations and individuals, which points to active engagement with interest groups.

Not enough data.

There is too little data.

The speaker is active in the plenary session, posing several questions to ministers from various fields and delivering a substantive speech regarding the supplementary budget. He/She refers to participation in the work of the Finance Committee, where the Fiscal Council provided an overview of its viewpoints.