By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The political stance is geared toward supporting administrative efficiency and the centralization of services, particularly the relocation of birth registration to county centers. We support the Ministry of the Interior's initial plan, stressing the necessity for greater expertise and the extensive utilization of e-services. This position is distinctly policy- and results-driven, focusing on preserving the quality of service and the qualifications of public officials.

The political position is strongly aimed at improving the state's functionality and efficiency, emphasizing the need to reduce bureaucracy and state expenditure, which aligns with the desires of the business community. The speaker is concerned about the public sector's slow adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), which has left the sector in a mediocre position regarding procedural processes. The position is results-based, focusing on reducing the number of officials and addressing the limits of procedural capacity.

Pipi-Liis Siemann represents a moderate, procedure-centric political position, focusing on issues of constitutional and administrative law. She supports the current residency registration system in the context of elections, noting that it requires further extensive discussion, but simultaneously acknowledges existing problems, such as the issue of "decoy candidates" and a lack of proper oversight. Her views are strongly policy-driven, emphasizing the stability of the legal framework and the accessibility of services.

The political focus is centered on policy effectiveness and the competitiveness of the economy. The speaker supports expanding housing programs into areas suffering from market failure and calls for measures to boost the competitiveness of businesses affected by high energy prices. He expresses the expectation that the activities and programs promised in the coalition agreement will deliver tangible results. The political framework itself is primarily policy- and performance-based.

The political emphasis is placed on the administrative reform of the judicial system, advocating for the reduction of political influence and bureaucracy in court management, aiming for optimization and modernization. Another significant issue was the necessity of establishing a new investigative commission, concerning which the speaker relayed the committee's strong procedural opposition and its proposal to reject the draft legislation. The overall framework is policy- and procedure-focused, emphasizing structural efficiency.

The political stance is strongly value-based, focusing on the protection of children's rights within the context of custody disputes. The speaker sharply criticizes the current judicial system, which they deem ineffective and where parents abuse their rights. The goal is to stop the use of custody rights as a weapon and ensure a safe environment for children to grow up in.

The political focus centers on the legal nuances of restricting suffrage, tied to the declaration of Russia as a state with a terrorist regime. The speaker relays the Constitutional Committee's position, which supports rejecting the bill because restricting voting rights primarily necessitates amending the constitution. This stance is procedural and focused on the correctness of legal acts, rather than being value-driven.