By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker first acknowledges the difficult challenges facing agricultural and food producers, but then shifts focus to regional development. The political stance is aimed at initiating and supporting cooperation among local governments to improve the business environment. The position is clearly policy-driven and solution-oriented.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The speaker's focus is procedural, concentrating on conveying the Constitutional Committee's debate regarding the draft bill on population records. Important topics also include the right of discretion within local governments and ensuring the accessibility of services in the context of e-services. The stance is moderate and policy-based, emphasizing the need to resolve crucial issues, such as the registration of a minor child's residence.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political focus is directed towards preventing financial fraud, especially cross-border payment orders and card payment fraud. A policy question is being raised regarding whether statistics can help find practical solutions beyond merely increasing financial literacy. The position is moderately supportive of data collection, but stresses the need to convert statistics into preventative measures applicable throughout society.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The political position focuses on promoting consumer financial literacy and risk awareness within the financial environment. The speaker supports raising awareness among young people, the elderly, and debt counselors, and aims to assess whether progress can be observed based on consumer complaints. This is a policy-based approach that focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of existing activities.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political stance centers on restrictions regarding candidacy in local elections. As a representative of the leading committee, he proposes rejecting the draft bill, while simultaneously acknowledging that the problem (the so-called "decoy candidate touring") exists and requires more extensive discussion. He emphasizes long-term reliance on population register entries as sufficient proof of connection to the place of residence. The position is primarily procedural and policy-based, stressing the continuity of the existing legal framework.