By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

No opposition exists; the address is focused on raising questions and seeking solutions, while acknowledging the minister's work to date.

There is no opposition. The speech is neutral and focuses on presenting the commission's work, rather than criticizing other parties. Instead, the focus was on highlighting concerns raised within the commission (e.g., service availability), for which the Ministry of the Interior provided clarifications.

Insufficient data.

There is too little data.

The direct opposition is aimed at the draft bill currently under discussion, which the commission recommended rejecting because it does not offer a sufficiently well-considered solution. He/She also criticizes the practical shortcomings of the current system, noting that rural municipality and city secretaries are not interested in verifying the actual place of residence. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.