By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The style is polite and respectful, addressing the minister formally and offering thanks for the presentation. The speaker employs a logical approach, presenting a specific policy question concerning the support of regional development. The tone is consultative and solution-seeking.

The style is formal, objective, and procedural, fitting the role of the committee rapporteur. The discourse is logical and evidence-based, neutrally conveying the discussion, questions, and responses received during the committee proceedings. Emotional or personal appeals are absent, with the focus remaining strictly on facts and procedural decisions.

The speaker's style is formal and respectful, addressing both the session chair and the presenter with deference. The rhetoric is analytical and logical, focusing on posing questions regarding the practical application of statistics and potential avenues for fraud prevention. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed squarely on facts and the consequences of the policy.

The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and inquisitive, addressing the session chair and the presenter respectfully. The tone is analytical and logical, expressing appreciation for the work accomplished, but subsequently focusing on the objective assessment of the situation and inquiring about progress.

The style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the commission's work and procedural decisions. Following the official review, he/she permits the expression of a personal, logic-based opinion, emphasizing the significance of the legal framework and historical practices. The language is clear and factual, avoiding emotional appeals.