By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The speaker adopts a procedural stance, questioning the necessity of establishing a new investigative committee, given that existing special committees could already handle the matter. He strongly supports the Constitutional Committee’s proposal to reject the draft legislation, a proposal which achieved a clear consensus within the committee (6 votes in favor, 1 against). The focus is primarily on procedural correctness and the capacity of the institutions involved.

The political focus is on reforming the governance of the judicial system, stressing the necessity of reducing the executive branch's political ties to judicial oversight to ensure the independence of judges. The speaker strongly backs the draft legislation, viewing it as essential for cutting down fragmentation, modernizing management, and aligning the system with European practices. The objective is to shift clear accountability directly to the courts themselves, thereby cutting back on bureaucracy.