By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft legislation and their proposal to establish a new investigative commission. The criticism is procedural and based on feasibility, highlighting the sheer volume of tasks planned for the proposed commission and the unrealistic deadline (May 1st). Questions are also being raised about why a new commission needs to be established when existing bodies could handle the matter.

Direct confrontation is not expressed, but criticism is aimed at the fragmentation and bureaucracy of the current court management system, which is considered the source of conflict. Jaak Valge’s concerns regarding the length and expense of proceedings are mentioned, but it is noted that the draft bill under consideration does not directly resolve them.