By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann

Total Months: 14

Fully Profiled: 14

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

2 Speeches

There is no direct criticism of opponents, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the current state of the public sector. The criticism is procedural, as the sector has failed to significantly reduce the number of officials despite technological advancements.
Details View Details
09.2025

18 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed instead at systemic flaws, such as the lack of interest among rural municipality and city secretaries in verifying actual residency. He/She also points out the ministry’s failure to provide a solution for supervising residence registration in connection with local government elections.
Details View Details
06.2025

3 Speeches

There is no direct opposition or criticism of specific political adversaries. Instead, the criticism is aimed primarily at the deficiencies in the conditions and targeting of previous programs (such as the rental housing program), and these points are framed as constructive questions intended to improve future policy.
Details View Details
05.2025

7 Speeches

Direct personal opposition is not expressed, but the speaker conveys the commission’s questions regarding the expediency of establishing a new investigative committee, asking why existing special committees could not be utilized instead. Concerning judicial reform, emphasis is placed on the need to reduce the indirect involvement of politicians in the supervision and management of the courts, which is an area of conflict.
Details View Details
04.2025

1 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at parents who abuse their custody rights and parental responsibilities, thereby leaving their children unprotected. The legal system is also indirectly criticized for having allowed the administration of justice to migrate to a "virtual marketplace." The critique is intense and focuses on both behavioral and systemic deficiencies.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

The direct objection targets the procedural correctness of the bill initiated by Leo Kunnas, rather than its objective. This objection is legally justified, stressing that the government shares the view that amending the constitution is necessary. The criticism focuses on the legal execution of the draft law, not the initiator personally.
Details View Details
12.2024

5 Speeches

The main targets of criticism are the initiators of the bills (Lauri Laats and his group), whom he accuses of populism and unconstructive debate. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (immature bills) and the procedure and rhetoric (whataboutism). He strongly opposes the idea that dignity should be regulated by law, and expresses confidence in the responsibility of the Riigikogu members.
Details View Details
10.2024

2 Speeches

Direct personal opposition was not expressed, but the speaker referenced the committee majority's decision to reject the bill for establishing a special committee on the demographic crisis (6 votes for, 4 against). The criticism focused on procedural aspects and the avoidance of policy duplication, citing the existence of the Ministry of the Interior's development plan.
Details View Details
09.2024

5 Speeches

The speaker communicates the opposition of the government and ministries to the draft bills, an opposition that is policy-based and focuses on substantive shortcomings. The criticism is directed at the arguments put forth by the initiators of the bills, specifically highlighting the lack of economic analysis in the draft bill for a new national holiday and the potential unfairness of changing the electoral system. The opposition is procedural and substantive in nature, rather than personal.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation, but criticism is aimed at the current legislation, which violates the principle of legal clarity and gives rise to unconstitutional situations. The Ministry of Justice's position that the regulation is constitutional is treated as one side of the debate—its arguments were heard, but the commission ultimately did not support it.
Details View Details
05.2024

4 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
03.2024

11 Speeches

The opposition is aimed at narrowly focused draft laws that fail to address the problem comprehensively, criticizing the creation of a single exception for government members concerning security vetting. The speaker emphasizes that security is not enhanced by "ripping out a small, isolated piece," but rather by the systemic approach planned by the Ministry of the Interior.
Details View Details
02.2024

7 Speeches

Direct opposition is aimed at the draft bill which seeks to establish a C1 language requirement for council members, criticizing it as an unnecessary restriction. Indirectly, local municipalities are criticized where Estonian-language official business is not adhered to, demanding an improvement in political culture there.
Details View Details
01.2024

2 Speeches

The confrontation is primarily aimed at the political dogma that desperately strives to keep schools open in areas where there are no longer enough children, completely disregarding the quality of education. Regional policy is also criticized for believing that the mere presence of a school is enough, by itself, to halt population decline.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling