By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

Criticism is aimed at the initiators of the bill (Lauri Laats and his group), who are accused of employing populism by pitting "our group or your group" against the people. The opposition is primarily value-based, calling into question the necessity and effectiveness of the draft legislation, given that it may fail to prevent the misuse of funds. The speaker observes that the initiator's rhetoric has shifted toward left-wing populism during the plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill (represented by Lauri Laats), the rejection of whose proposal the committee recommended by a vote of 5 in favor and 3 against. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the low standard of the plenary debate, accusing participants of straying from the topic and presenting irrelevant arguments (e.g., investment plans).