By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The collaborative style was evident in procedural matters, where the committee made a consensus proposal to include the draft bill on the plenary agenda. However, in substantive decision-making, the committee was clearly divided, proposing to reject the draft bill by a vote of 6 in favor and 4 against.

The speaker values the constructive cooperation achieved at the committee level, where they were able to substantively discuss the draft's deficiencies and reach a consensus regarding the legal status of the obligations of Members of Parliament. He/She characterizes the committee discussion as significantly more constructive compared to the plenary debate.