By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, combining detailed reporting on commission work with strong moral and philosophical arguments. It uses a value-based appeal, emphasizing ethics, morality, and dignity, and quotes Dostoevsky to justify trust in those holding power. It labels the opposition's actions as populism, distinguishing between right-wing and left-wing populist rhetoric.

The style is formal and procedural, focusing on facts and the communication of the commission's decisions. The speaker uses a critical tone to contrast the commission's constructive discussion with the non-substantive and tangential debate of the plenary session, specifically criticizing the use of "whataboutism." The appeal is primarily logical and centers on the correctness of the procedure.