By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The legislative focus is on opposing the draft law concerning a climate-resilient economy and demanding the termination of its proceedings. Also a priority is clarifying the current status of meeting nature conservation goals and collecting related data.

The legislative focus is on opposing the specific protection rules for the new Natura sites, as the speaker believes these rules infringe upon property rights. Secondly, the implementation of the Arms Act is being monitored, emphasizing the urgent need to quickly establish the ministerial regulations stipulated by the law, two of which are still missing.

The focus is on the critical evaluation of the existing education policy and the experiments conducted by the ministry. There are no indications of initiating or supporting new legislative bills.

The speaker’s primary legislative focus is opposing the amendments to the Environmental Act (Drafts 610, 612) because they establish special conservation zones and restrict forest management. Furthermore, he is interested in the status of plans for major infrastructure projects, such as offshore wind farms.

The legislative focus is on monitoring the implementation of existing reforms (the care reform) and budgeting for investments (shooting ranges) falling under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior. The speaker is a strong proponent of the amendments to the Arms Act being pushed by Minister Taro, viewing them as progress toward comprehensive national defense. He acts both as an initiator (through interpellations) and as a supporter.

The legislative focus is directed toward the procedural management of handling amendments and draft legislation. The Speaker's role is to initiate votes ("Please put the amendment to a vote"), positioning them primarily as the conductor of the proceedings rather than a substantive proponent or opponent.

The legislative focus centers on the procedure for the specific draft bill and ensuring its adherence to legal standards. The speaker is acting in an oversight capacity, demanding accountability for how the legal experts' criticism of the previous draft was addressed.