By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The economic views are implicit, but they reveal strong skepticism and opposition toward economic regulation and legislation based on climate goals. The speaker considers the "climate-resilient economy" law pointless and advises against pursuing it.

Economic perspectives strongly emphasize the inviolability of private property and the necessity of fair compensation in the event of nationalization. Criticism is directed at the state's actions, which essentially seize property while compensating only for the nominal increase (160 euros/ha) rather than the property's market value (125,000 euros). There is support for easing regulations on businesses (such as establishing factories and developing operational capacity).

Insufficient data.

The speaker is a strong defender of private property and market economy principles, opposing state intervention that diminishes the value of land. He criticizes the government's actions, which result in a drop in land prices and offer insufficient compensation (160 euros per hectare), deeming this unfair.

Economic views are centered on concerns regarding the sensible use of taxpayer money, criticizing overly expensive and narrowly applicable investments ("niche products") within the internal security sector. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the unreasonable financial burden imposed on local municipalities due to the care reform, indicating a need to review the distribution of costs between the state and local authorities.

There is not enough data. Economic policy positions (taxes, spending, regulations) are entirely absent.

Insufficient data.