By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Information is scarce. The speaker instead emphasizes his party's (Isamaa) historical opposition and isolation during the 2004 convention debate, without mentioning current forms of cooperation.

The speaker addresses their colleagues ("Dear colleagues") and stresses that certain issues (such as the inequality of the CAP—Common Agricultural Policy) are objective and have persisted for 20 years, meaning they are not solely the fault of the current government. This suggests a willingness to discuss long-term problems. Direct references to bilateral cooperation or a readiness for compromise are absent.

Demonstrates a pragmatic willingness to cooperate during the processing of the draft bill, supporting the clarification of the wording based on the proposals submitted by the Ministry of the Interior, in order to make the law more unambiguous and avoid further disputes. Reference is made to the consensus vote within the Constitutional Committee regarding procedural matters, which indicates a readiness to compromise for the sake of procedural clarity.

Insufficient data.

While there is no direct information regarding cooperation, the speaker proposes clear alternative solutions (ending the discussion or taking a break) to resolve the situation, demonstrating a desire to resolve the procedural deadlock.