By Plenary Sessions: Signe Riisalo

The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu, who is sharply criticized for leveling sweeping and irrelevant accusations that were presented "without knowing the substance." The criticism is aimed at the opponent's incompetence and the unfair attack against the political process.

No direct or intense confrontation is evident; the amendments proposed by the Centre Party faction (e.g., raising the age limit to 21) are handled as part of the standard procedure. The speaker mildly criticizes the practice of adding a provision unrelated to the bill, citing its unethical nature, but bases this criticism on the opinion of another committee member (Helmen Kütt).

The opposition is directed at the continued processing of the draft bill, which is technically inefficient because the law being amended will soon lose validity. The criticism is purely procedural and aimed at ensuring the efficiency of the legislative process, not specific political opponents.