By Plenary Sessions: Signe Riisalo

The rhetorical style is defensive and confrontational, accusing the opponent of making sweeping and irrelevant accusations, as well as demonstrating ignorance of the substance. It employs direct address and a sharp tone, demanding the opponent remain silent ("Maybe you would let others speak for a change?"). The appeals are primarily logical, relying on the length and specific details of the negotiations.

The language used is formal, detailed, and procedural, typical of a commission rapporteur providing an overview of the legislative process. The tone is neutral and explanatory, focusing on logical appeals, documentation, and emphasizing consensus-based decisions. Brief, informal apologies ("Oops, sorry") occur when correcting procedural errors.

The rhetorical style is formal, measured, and focuses on logical and technical justifications. Although a slight sadness ("there is a little sadness") regarding the procedure is expressed, the argumentation remains highly pragmatic and fact-based, avoiding emotional appeals.