By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in the field of public finance and macroeconomics, utilizing specific terminology (GDP, refinancable loans, sovereign rating, budgetary rules, structural funds). In their arguments, they rely on the assessments of experts (a professor, an economic research institute) and concrete figures (1.2% of GDP, 4.1% utilization of EU funds), emphasizing the critical importance of fiscal policy predictability.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of energy (supply security, controllable capacity, 4+4 TWh, nuclear energy) and state finance (GDP, reduction of administrative expenditures, EU funds utilization rate of 4.1%). They utilize data and statistics to critique the government's management style and demand specific prognostic assessments concerning tax increases (specifically, the land tax). Furthermore, the speaker references legal controversy (the interpretation of the constitution regarding voting rights) and specific details of the budget procedure.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in state finance and government expenditures, citing specific procurements and figures (for instance, 15 million euros allocated to the green skills program). Furthermore, they are well-informed about the low utilization rate (4.1%) of the European Union structural funds and the delays affecting the apartment building renovation program. They also exhibit knowledge of parliamentary procedures, particularly concerning the handling of motions of no confidence.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of state finance and tax policy, referencing the cost of abolishing the Reform Party’s 'tax hump,' according to the Ministry of Finance’s assessment. They also maintain a strong focus on the Riigikogu’s procedural rules, criticizing the rapporteur for failing to substantively introduce the proposed amendments. Technical terms such as "tax hump" and "voting results of the amendment proposal" are used.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in macroeconomics, energy policy, and the utilization of European Union structural funds. Specific data points are cited, such as the 4.1% of structural funds channeled into implementation, and reference is made to the assessments provided by the Institute of Economic Research. Particular emphasis is placed on the necessity of adopting a holistic approach and conducting impact analyses concerning the green transition and energy policy matters.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in international law and the creation of precedents regarding frozen assets, citing examples from the legal frameworks of the US, Canada, and the Anglo-American sphere. In economic policy, he focuses on the direct financial burdens that reforms (concerning water, waste, and climate legislation) impose on consumers and businesses, repeatedly calling for the submission of a substantive impact assessment. He also addresses topics related to energy and infrastructure, emphasizing security of supply and a competitive electricity price.

The speaker demonstrates deep expertise in state budget execution and financial management, focusing on the amounts expended, the budget balance, and the carry-over of funds into 2024. He/She employs technical terminology and demands specific figures in euros, citing the necessity for making informed management decisions. The speaker is aware of the budget volume approved by the legislature (16.8 billion euros) and casts doubt on the alternative figure presented by the prime minister.

The speaker demonstrates competence regarding the content of state security and intelligence reports (KAPO), referring to a specific report and its discussion of the possibilities for the suspension and permanent revocation of voting rights. He/She clearly distinguishes between different legal solutions and demands a clear recommendation from the government concerning the security authority’s position.

The speaker demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act and procedural nuances, raising complex legal questions concerning the bundling of amendments. They possess a detailed understanding of public finance, referencing the Maastricht criteria, GDP percentages, and the State Budget Act. Furthermore, they are well-versed in international sanctions and legal precedents (US, Canada, EU).

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in public finance and budgetary processes, citing budget execution forecasts, the reduction of government expenditures, and the necessity of a deficit budget. They also possess knowledge of international diplomacy (UN Security Council) and the financing mechanisms for aiding Ukraine. They are demanding specific financial data from the government, such as the unspent budget appropriations for 2023.

The speaker demonstrates authority on security issues, stressing the necessity for national sanctions and the transparency of threat assessments provided by security agencies to the parliament. Furthermore, they possess detailed knowledge of the history of education policy, referencing Isamaa’s prior action plans (Tõnis Lukas) and the specifics of coalition negotiations. Specific terminology is employed, such as "church schism," "reduction of contact instruction," and the "EIS system," which points to a deep engagement with sectoral issues.