By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The speaker has been actively involved with the climate law issue, having repeatedly conveyed their message (the demand for a moratorium) to the minister since the beginning of the year. They also reference having carefully reviewed the concerns of stakeholders and various societal groups regarding the government's decisions. This pattern of activity demonstrates persistent and consistent criticism on the subject.

Speeches are concentrated during plenary sessions, where lengthy and detailed questions and remarks are presented concerning several draft laws, particularly those initiated by the Reform Party and the coalition. The speaker repeatedly references earlier political events and Isamaa's initiatives (e.g., spring 2022), demonstrating a long-term commitment to these issues and emphasizing their party's role as the originator of the topics.

The MP is actively participating in the Riigikogu Q&A session, consistently posing questions on the same subject. This pattern demonstrates the persistent raising of the issue, referencing a previous debate held on Monday, with the goal of obtaining specific and numerically substantiated answers from the government. Furthermore, the MP is seeking guidance from the Chair on how to ensure the Prime Minister addresses the specific details provided.

The pattern of activity involves active participation in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, specifically by submitting interpellations to the Prime Minister. The content of these interpellations is directly drawn from the protest issued by 40 Estonian business organizations, which demonstrates a tight link with an external pressure group.

The speaker was extremely active during the plenary session, participating intensely in the budget debate, repeatedly raising procedural questions to the Chair and the presenters, and demanding answers regarding the blocking of the Isamaa party's amendments. Their contributions were lengthy and highly detailed, focusing both on substantive policy choices and deficiencies in the parliament's operational procedures.

The speaker is active in the parliament's plenary sessions, submitting bills aimed at repealing tax increases (this followed the car tax bill). In the summer, he/she participated in a discussion on the Land Tax Act within the parliament's Finance Committee. The operational pattern is reactive, focusing on opposing government bills and initiating their repeal.

Speeches were delivered during the plenary session of the Riigikogu, focusing on criticism of the government’s tax policy and budget management. The speaker used the rostrum to convey a clear message to the Estonian people concerning the temporary nature of the car tax.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly posing questions to the Prime Minister and the committee chairman, and delivering lengthy speeches during debates on draft legislation (the car tax). He/She references recent events, such as European Parliament hearings, the United States presidential election, and protest actions by Tallinn accommodation providers, demonstrating a continuous engagement with current affairs.