By Agendas: Valdo Randpere

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of macroeconomic indicators, directly referencing GDP and the concentration of economic activity. The expertise is focused on issues of regional development and stimulating production outside the capital city. Specific terms are used, such as "accounting for a disproportionately large share of our GDP" and "production/manufacturing."

The speaker demonstrates specific knowledge of central bank financial management, accurately citing Section 30 of the Bank of Estonia Act, which governs the allocation of profit between reserve and core capital. Furthermore, historical data (spanning the last 15 years, including 2020) regarding transfers made to the state budget is utilized, suggesting comprehensive research on the subject.

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in legal matters and parliamentary procedure. They employ specific terminology ("lawyer," "text of the law," "commented edition") and stress that a commentary is not law, referencing Ülle Madise's position on the matter. The expertise focuses on the strict and formal interpretation of legal acts.

The speaker demonstrated expertise regarding the work and procedural procedures of the Legal Committee. Furthermore, they were knowledgeable about the specific activities undertaken by state institutions (the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, the Prosecutor's Office) and the private sector (banks) in combating fraud. They referenced the fraud analysis recently completed by the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs and were aware of international legal nuances, citing, for example, the punishability of cyber fraud in Great Britain. They stressed that the solution lies in cooperation between law enforcement agencies and the private sector.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the field of international aviation security and the regulation of offenses, briefly outlining the substance of the draft bill (courteous behavior and aviation security). The speaker is also familiar with the legislative procedure, referencing the bill's handling in the committee and the scheduling of the vote.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in matters of international aviation law and jurisdiction, explaining why Estonian citizens were not previously subject to liability. He/She clearly distinguishes pre-flight violations (which are governed by law enforcement acts) from acts committed during the flight, for which the convention establishes liability. This competence is also personally emphasized, as the speaker was appointed rapporteur specifically on the basis of this expertise.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of European countries' experiences with reducing VAT on foodstuffs and its consequences, using Sweden as an example, where prices have risen. Additionally, he has precise local knowledge regarding the Viimsi retail network, correcting the chairman's factual error concerning the location of Konsum stores.

The speaker demonstrates a profound understanding of strategic management tools, specifically defining the objective and function of "Estonia 2035." They exhibit expertise in legislative history, citing precise dates and governments involved in the strategy document's drafting process, and recalling the detailed circumstances surrounding the 2012 amendment to the Collective Agreement Act.

Knowledge is demonstrated regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and the competence of special committees, stressing the necessity of operating strictly within one's own mandate. Previous speakers exhibit detailed knowledge of recent history, correcting the timeline of the change in Kaja Kallas’s government with precise dates (June/July 2022). One speaker substantiates their arguments by quoting specific newspaper headlines.

The speaker demonstrates specific knowledge of international maritime law and treaties, repeatedly highlighting the international agreement on the sanctity of the MS Estonia wreck site as a crucial precedent. This specialized expertise is also evident in the references made to treaty clauses that obligated the contracting states to amend their domestic legislation. He uses a historical example to propose a solution for protecting infrastructure in the Baltic Sea.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of criminal law and procedural economy, utilizing technical terminology and referencing the principles of the administration of justice. He addresses potential conflicts between articles of the Constitution (e.g., § 24 and § 22) and possesses detailed knowledge of the amendments to Draft Act 225 and their impact. He relies on the work and opinions of experts from the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Court (including Villu Kõve).

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the historical and procedural aspects concerning the financing of the Tallinn Hospital project, emphasizing the problems associated with the project deadlines. The expertise is based on recalling specific events and statements, referring, for instance, to Mihhail Kõlvart's 2022 interview.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the security-political and strategic importance of Rail Baltic, highlighting the role railways play in the war in Ukraine. He is also knowledgeable about European Union funding mechanisms, explaining that if the project is halted, the received support must be repaid, and this money cannot be redirected for military purchases. He also refers to his previous experience as Minister of Defence.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in lawmaking and constitutional principles by explaining the concept of parliamentary immunity (indemnity). He highlights the technical differences between the Estonian and American legal systems (subpoena, testifying under oath) and analyzes the draft bill's potential impact on ministerial responsibility. This expertise is grounded in identifying both substantive and legal errors within the proposed legislation.

Insufficient data.

He demonstrates expertise in the field of constitutional rights and criminal procedure, citing Article 22 of the Constitution. Randpere is aware of issues concerning media ethics and journalistic practices, drawing comparisons to Sweden’s more civilized practices regarding the treatment of suspects. He has previously addressed the same topic as a member of the ERR Council.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the internal rules and legislation of the Riigikogu, citing the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act and the jurisdiction of committees, particularly the Select Committee on State Budget Control. This knowledge centers on parliamentary oversight and procedural regulations. The importance of budgetary matters within the scope of responsibility of government members is also noted.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in cultural heritage and monument protection, citing the status of the Tallinn Linnahall and the history of its listing (signed by Jaak Allik in 1999). The discussion also covers the draft bill for the extension of the National Opera Estonia and the related restrictions imposed on the downtown area.

Demonstrates competence in legislation and the legal system, particularly concerning the regulation of the prosecutor's office and court procedure, while clarifying the legal nature of supervision. He/She utilizes committee protocols and refers to specific cases (e.g., Kalle Laanet's resignation, delays in court proceedings) and previous legislative initiatives. He/She emphasizes that the courts are the ones who bring the prosecution's errors to light, thereby proving that supervision is functioning.

The speaker demonstrates a deep understanding of the legal nuances involved in money laundering investigations, particularly concerning the requirement to prove the predicate offense within the context of the presumption of innocence. They are keenly aware of the practical ineffectiveness of mutual legal assistance between Estonia and Russia, citing the collapse of the Swedbank money laundering investigation as a prime example, and referencing the experiences of former Prosecutor General Lavly Perling.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in tax policy, employing technical terminology such as the "tax hump" and the "untaxed minimum income." Concrete figures and thresholds are presented (for instance, a tax-free minimum of 700 euros and an income limit of 8,000 euros) to illustrate the wide-ranging impact of their preferred tax reform. This expertise is then used to expose the flaws in the opposition's proposal, citing the effect of VAT reduction on luxury items (caviar, champagne) as a prime example.

The speakers demonstrate knowledge of the functioning of legal assistance agreements, the procedural rules of the Riigikogu (committee meetings, consensus decisions), and the unreliability of the Russian legal system. Reference is made to international security conferences (Munich 2024) and specialized literature ("Not One Inch"), as well as practical examples concerning the lack of legal assistance in money laundering cases.

Demonstrates awareness of past tax policy mistakes, citing a specific estimated figure (235 million euros) related to tax leakage into Latvia. It also has an overview of the public reception of the ongoing draft bill (the car tax) and the emotional reaction generated by its name.

The speaker demonstrates authority in the domain of the Estonian language and legislative terminology, intensely emphasizing the grammatical and semantic accuracy of the bill's title. Furthermore, they exhibit knowledge of the Riigikogu procedure, referencing prior committee work (as a rapporteur) and bills that were dropped from the agenda.

Shows knowledge regarding the pension system reform, the suspension of government contributions, and the associated financial damages (22 million euros). Uses terminology related to financial policy and banking, while simultaneously referring to another individual as a "serious specialist in banking and financial transactions."

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in the legal system and procedural law, employing specific terminology such as "judgment that has entered into force" and "pre-trial investigation." He explains the system's operation, stressing that errors by the Prosecutor's Office are rare and are invariably identified and corrected by the courts. He relies on systemic arguments, asserting that the activities of the justice administration bodies cannot be interfered with without compromising the system.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the current state of higher education funding in Estonia, mentioning the existing model of free Estonian-language instruction. Their expertise is evident in the ability to ask questions regarding specific political formats and the capacity to connect the issue of non-residents with broader financial matters.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in matters of state sovereignty and residence permit regulations, drawing comparisons to the practices of other countries. They also possess knowledge concerning the positions of the Russian Orthodox Church, the superficies agreements of the City of Tallinn, and the historical suitability of the church within the Republic of Estonia.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in higher education funding and reforms, specifically referencing the 2011/2012 changes and the role of the Isamaa party in pushing them through. The argument is supported by an international comparison, inquiring about the funding models of the world's 30 top universities (free education versus scholarships).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in public finance and education sector budget matters, pointing out that the Ministry of Education commands one of the largest budgets, suggesting there are areas where savings could be made. This expertise is also apparent in the emphasis placed on the direct correlation between structural reforms (such as rationalizing the school network) and wage increases. Furthermore, the speaker is knowledgeable about the timing of the teachers' strike and the ambiguity surrounding its objectives.

Demonstrates deep proficiency in criminal procedure and the principles of the rule of law, especially concerning the activities and oversight of the Prosecutor's Office. He/She clearly distinguishes between internal administrative oversight and proceedings initiated based on a crime report, referencing the Ministry of Justice's stance on the separation of powers. This expertise is also evident in the emphasis placed on the three-tiered court system as a functioning control mechanism.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the opposition party's (EKRE) previous political stances, especially regarding the issue of surrogacy. The speaker is also well versed in the procedural history of the Riigikogu, referencing the handling of bills last autumn (the submission of amendments).