By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The speaker is strongly in opposition, criticizing the coalition's political hypocrisy and inaction. The criticism is aimed at the coalition's voting behavior, which has repeatedly rejected the Center Party's social and economic proposals. The disagreement is grounded in both policy and procedural matters, accusing the coalition of voting down the opposition's good ideas.

The primary opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), particularly the Reform Party, which is being blamed for the poor economic situation since 2021. The criticism is intense and focuses on the political failure regarding the freezing of civil servants' salaries. The speaker also references former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's previous remarks concerning the salary expectations of public sector workers.

The opposition is directed at the previous decision to close the New York Consulate General, criticizing the cost argument used to justify it ("too expensive for us"). Current foreign policy leadership is also criticized regarding the UN vote, citing a procedural error and a failure to synchronize with allies.

The opposition maintains a strong stance directed against the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democratic Party), which they accuse of worsening the situation for families and automatically dismissing the opposition’s good ideas. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on budget cuts and the introduction of new taxes, and is also aimed at specific ministers (Kristina Kallas, Riisalo).

Criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MKM), whose proposal to assign additional duties to the Chancellor of Justice caught many off guard. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, questioning whether the proposal was previously discussed and coordinated, and whether it poses a threat to the quality of the work.

The criticism is aimed at the government’s policy regarding pay raises for internal security personnel, as police officers, rescue workers, and border guards will not receive a salary increase for the second consecutive year. The opposition is political and focuses on failed resource management, which prevents the police from carrying out their duties.

The opposition is aimed at the state's current communication strategy, which focuses excessively on frightening people with the prospect of military conflict. The critique is policy-based and targets strategic inefficiency, not individuals.

The main criticism is aimed at the inaction of the minister and the government regarding the fulfillment of promised salary increases within the internal security sector. The criticism is based on both policy and performance, addressing the motivation of personnel who are vital in the context of the nation's internal and external security. Former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas is also mentioned in relation to the long-term expectations for wage hikes (specifically the year 2028).

The criticism is aimed at the ministries that presented old and insufficient arguments against the draft bill, and those who failed to conduct a proper impact analysis. Specifically, he/she finds the Ministry of Education’s argument that the learning process would suffer due to one extra day implausible. Concern is also expressed that the draft bill might be rejected merely because it was submitted by an opposition force.

The main opponent is Minister of Education Kristina Kallas, whose competence is being called into question. She is being accused of covering up the facts and allowing negotiations to stall. Criticism is also aimed at the Prime Minister, who retained the minister in her post in the new government. The opposition is warning of a potential new teachers' strike, which they argue would demonstrate the minister’s unsuitability for the job.