By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The style of cooperation is emphatically a failure, as the speaker highlights the coalition's consistent refusal to support the opposition's constructive proposals. The speaker considers the coalition incapable of cooperation, given that they won't back even those ideas they praise verbally.

There is not enough data.

The speaker emphasizes the intra-factional unity (of the Centre Party faction) in opposing the closure of the Consulate General, noting that this unity existed previously as well. The style of cooperation is rather consensual, assuming that the proposal to restore the New York representation should enjoy widespread support, given that the USA is Estonia’s biggest ally.

The speaker criticizes the coalition's inability to cooperate, which stems from a political culture where opposition proposals are automatically rejected. At the same time, he expresses openness to compromises on the specifics of the draft legislation—for example, adjusting the amount of child benefits or school lunch support—provided the bill is advanced to the second reading.

Insufficient data.

The style of interaction is formal and respectful towards the minister, beginning with an acknowledgment of his lengthy presentation. Direct cooperation or a willingness to compromise is not expressed; instead, a pointed political question is raised concerning the government's actions.

The style of cooperation is dialogue-oriented, seeking common ground with the Minister regarding the strategy's key points and initiating the address based on the assumption that the Minister is in agreement. The speaker references previous communication, which demonstrates a readiness for a long-term discussion.

Insufficient data.

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cross-party cooperation, describing the draft bill as apolitical and referencing unofficial support received from other factions. He is open to debating colleagues' more radical suggestions (such as a four-day work week) and concurs with colleague Lauri Laats concerning the limited capacity of Riigikogu members to commission analyses.

The speaker emphasizes the previous cooperation among the opposition parties (Center Party, EKRE, and Isamaa) in submitting and voting for the motion of no confidence back in April. There is no information available regarding any search for compromises with the government; instead, sharp criticism is being leveled against the minister for their inaction.