By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

Insufficient data.

The cooperation is characterized by openness to stakeholder viewpoints, particularly in the education sector, where the lack of support from local governments and teachers' unions is emphasized. Although the faction is not proposing rejection, it demonstrates a readiness for legislative work, but notes that earlier amendments (submitted by the Centre Party faction) were rejected by the majority.

The speaker is acting in opposition, calling on fellow colleagues to oppose the draft bill ("We call on others to do the same"). The style of cooperation is one of confrontation rather than seeking compromise, as the bill is considered fundamentally unacceptable.

Insufficient data.

The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Party faction, presenting amendments intended to bring the draft legislation into constitutional compliance. He/She points to the fact that the President's representative supported the Centre Party's proposals, but observes that the coalition voted them down at the committee level. This demonstrates a readiness to offer solutions, while underscoring the opposing side's unwillingness to compromise.

Data is unavailable. The speech focuses exclusively on criticizing and opposing the government.

The speaker supports this bill and references the positions held by colleague Peeter Ernits, thereby demonstrating the existence of support within the faction. On the topic of school meals, the repeated initiative of the Centre Party faction is emphasized. However, there is no indication of a readiness to compromise with the governing coalition, given that previous attempts were voted down.

The speaker refers to the support group for large families formed within the Riigikogu, whose proposals (tax breaks concerning the motor vehicle tax) were rejected by the coalition. The Centre Party’s approach to eliminating kindergarten place fees in Tallinn is highlighted as a positive example, which demonstrates support for gradual and logical policy development. Information is lacking regarding any current cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition.

The speaker supports cross-party cooperation, citing three similar draft bills that demonstrate widespread recognition of the issue. Emphasis is placed on the unanimous support (six parties) within the Tallinn City Council for the idea of amending the regulation. However, disappointment is simultaneously expressed regarding the representatives of the Social Democratic Party who failed to support the Centre Party's initiative in the committee, despite sharing a common objective.

Cooperation with the Estonian Education Personnel Union was mentioned in the context of teachers' salary negotiations, supporting the union's proposal to raise the minimum salary to 2,184 euros. The speaker also referenced their political group's repeated legislative initiatives (the school meal bill), which demonstrates an initiative for cooperation at the legislative level, despite the opposition from the coalition.

Not enough data

Not enough data