By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The speaker actively advocates for regional cooperation, inquiring of the minister whether it would be prudent to partner with countries like Latvia and Lithuania on the nuclear power plant project. This signals a willingness to pursue solutions through international partnership.

Insufficient data

There is no evidence of cooperation suggesting a cross-party or broad-based coalition. The sole reference to a colleague (Lauri Laats) was utilized to support the description of the labor crisis, indicating alignment primarily within their own political faction. There is no information regarding a willingness to compromise.

The speaker refers to their faction’s (the Center Party) earlier attempt to contribute to the reform transitioning to Estonian-language education by submitting 50 amendments. These were rejected, and the faction was subsequently accused of sabotage. In the current context, there is a distinct lack of openness to compromise, with oppositional criticism being the dominant force.

The speaker aligns himself with the position of the President, who refused to promulgate the law, and uses the statements made by the chairmen of the Constitutional Committee and the Legal Affairs Committee to support his arguments. Center Party amendment proposal No. 1, which could have brought the law into compliance with the Constitution, was previously offered, but it was rejected.

Insufficient Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of involving all three parties—the employee, the employer, and the state—in the amendment of labor law, and demands that a compromise be found. Any cooperation regarding the current draft bill is being rejected because it is "just water for the employer's mill" and completely lacks compromise. The speaker notes that both the ELVL and the trade unions oppose the draft, indicating a willingness to cooperate specifically with these interest groups.

Insufficient data.