By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The speaker's style is collaborative and dialogue-oriented, addressing the presenter directly to seek clarification. He/She is looking for an opportunity to balance the policy, which indicates an openness to finding solutions and compromises.

The speaker detailed the lack of cooperation, pointing out that the coalition refused to debate the amendments proposed by Center Party colleague Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart concerning the Law on Churches. It is stressed that the opposition's proposals are rejected even when the coalition acknowledges that changes are necessary.

The speaker sees the need for cooperation with the private sector, calling on banks and communication operators to assume greater responsibility and take measures to protect people. Direct inter-party cooperation was not mentioned; instead, attention was directed toward the new minister with the hope that they will fare better than their predecessor.

The speaker acknowledged previous effective cooperation between the government and the Riigikogu (e.g., the construction of the ERR building and the renovation of the National Library), but referred to this as a rare positive exception. He also congratulated his colleagues (Madis Kallas, Lauri Laats), thereby demonstrating internal collegiality. Reference was made to the Centre Party's role in financing earlier sports facilities, emphasizing the contribution of their own party.

There isn't enough data.

The speaker stresses the consistent effort of their faction (the Estonian Centre Party faction) in bringing this issue to the forefront. Cooperation with the coalition is improbable, although hope for a "miracle" is expressed. Previous collaboration with the Social Democrats is criticized due to their belated support and earlier failures to vote, though the speaker hopes for their support now that they are in opposition.

The style of cooperation is open and procedural, involving direct communication with the rapporteur to ensure a correct understanding of the legal situation and the proper application of the legislation. The objective is a shared interpretation of the law.

The speaker identifies themselves as a representative of the opposition, focusing on criticizing the government and demanding accountability. There is no information regarding cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political parties or the governing coalition.

Data is scarce.

Data is scarce.

There is not enough data.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with other opposition factions (Isamaa, EKRE, the Centre Party) regarding the repeal of the car tax. Concerning the Church Law, the speaker represents the Centre Party faction's strong opposition, while also noting the support for their stance from the public and experts (theologians, the commissioner).

Demonstrates cooperation within the faction, referencing the Center Party faction's previous stances on the car tax. It expresses clear agreement with the rapporteur when evaluating the government's mistakes, noting that this is truly a massive blunder.

Insufficient dataset