By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and their ministry, particularly concerning those officials who are seen as the drivers of radical climate ideas. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the ministry of hiring "mad climate fanatics" in its personnel selection.

The main opponents are the government and the coalition, who are intensely criticized regarding their policies and values. The criticism targets specific political decisions, such as the disregard of the language proficiency requirement and maintaining the operation of the Ministry of Culture’s cultural diversity department.

The primary adversary is the minister and the government as a whole, who are being criticized for political passivity and inefficiency regarding national issues. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, directly accusing the government of failing to represent Estonian interests.

The opposition is directed against the current e-voting system and its defenders, who claim the system complies with international norms ("That's what we're told..."). The criticism is procedural and systemic, focusing on deficiencies in reliability and verifiability.

The main opponent is the coalition and the government (dubbed the "government of liars"), which is sharply criticized for both its policies (creating a dystopia, sheer madness) and procedural violations (breaching the constitution and the Rules of Procedure Act, employing steamroller tactics). The criticism is intense and uncompromisingly confrontational, accusing the coalition of abusing its power.

The main opponent is the distrusted minister, who is being criticized for the lackluster state of education policy and for self-adulation. The criticism also extends to other cabinet members, who are accused of imposing financial policy dogmas and obstructing the minister's work.