By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas
Total Sessions: 76
Fully Profiled: 76
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is directed against the government’s political decisions, particularly concerning the lack of justification for economic stimulus measures (VAT) and the limited scope of tax incentives for assisting Ukraine. The criticism is policy- and effectiveness-based, not personal.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the minister and the government, who are being sharply criticized for ignoring the economic situation. The criticism is policy-based (uncontrolled inflation) and intense, accusing the government of a shocking underestimation of people's concerns. The opposition is absolute, as the government's message is considered completely inappropriate for the public.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is directed at the Minister and the budget policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The criticism is intense and concerns both substantive issues (budget reduction) and procedural irregularities (failing to answer questions and deviating from the topic). The Minister is also accused of accusing the questioner and presenting fabricated claims.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the opposing side, which is being accused of demagoguery and outright lying. The attacks are intense and focus on the opponent's unethical conduct and the distortion of facts regarding social benefits and mobilization.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition is directed primarily at the illogical and unreasonable nature of the current regulation, which requires a full driving exam simply to obtain a license for using a larger trailer. No specific political opponents are being criticized.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The opposing party has been criticized for making naive claims—specifically that manufacturers could absorb the costs themselves—and for approving expensive structures without a proper cost-benefit analysis. The criticism is intense, focusing on the economic and procedural shortcomings of the policy's implementation.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The main adversaries are the board of Slava Ukraini, cited for their inaction, and political forces (Eesti 200, Parempoolsed), who are accused of forming a defensive circle [or 'running interference']. The criticism is intense, targeting both procedural failures (specifically, the failure to file a claim for damages) and personal political connections (involving Ilmar Raag and Lehtme’s mother). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the immediate recovery of the funds is being demanded.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the state’s inaction or inefficiency in securing defense industry investments, accusing officials of creating obstacles. The criticism is policy-based, highlighting specific failures that have deterred potential investors (Leonardo, Nammo).
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the bill’s proponents and the committee, faulting them for the lack of an impact assessment and consequently violating the Rules of Procedure Act. The opposition is intense and focuses on the procedural and financial lack of transparency in policy preparation.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the executive branch's inaction, particularly that of the Ministry of Defence, regarding the implementation of the "Estonia 2035" strategy. The opposition is policy-based, focusing on the inadequate follow-up to the previous strategic decision (withdrawal from the convention) and the lack of communication.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the Riigikogu Board and its committees, who are sharply criticized for violating procedural norms, making unlawful decisions, and failing to deliver on promises. The government is being opposed over the implementation of the car tax, with critics accusing it of extreme ideological bias and a disregard for the consequences. The criticism is intense, specifically accusing the Board of outright lying and deliberate actions aimed at sabotaging the proposed bills.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the bill initiated by the coalition, which is deemed a threat to national security and utterly senseless. He/She indirectly criticizes the questioning of the trustworthiness of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the ministries, and warns against allowing a "suspicious" and "Estonia-hostile" contingent to enter the country. The opposition is intense and politically charged, ruling out any possibility of compromise on the draft legislation.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is aimed at the actions of the Minister of the Interior concerning the classification of the GRU case for 75 years, a move considered improper and potentially linked to seeking domestic political gain. Criticism is also directed at the practice employed by local municipalities and service providers, which compels citizens to pay for a non-existent waste removal service—essentially selling "air."
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Prime Minister, who is criticized both for her policies (rising tax burden, reduction of subsidies) and her personal ethics (a direct accusation of lying). The intensity of the criticism is very high, and there is no sign of a willingness to compromise. The attacks are aimed at highlighting the contradiction between the government's claims and reality.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the earlier political decision in 2004 to join the convention, a decision considered thoughtless and dismissive of the military aspect. This position sharply contrasts with emotional objections (emails, descriptions of Cambodian children), which are deemed irrelevant in the Estonian strategic context. The main enemy is the "empire of evil" (Russia), against which mines are indispensable.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponents are the Reform Party, the Social Democrats (including Sven Mikser), and Estonia 200, who are sharply criticized for their lack of realism and inadequate decisions (such as acceding to the Ottawa Convention). The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing them of naivety and taking steps beneficial to the Kremlin. A compromise on the issue of anti-personnel mines is ruled out, as it is an existential matter from the perspective of national defense.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes both the current "so-called right-wing government" and previous social democrats, accusing them of dishonest and economy-damaging subsidy policies. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the suspension of subsidies for offshore wind farms, rather than their complete abandonment, and the purposeful maintenance of high energy prices.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts an interrogative and scrutinizing role towards the Minister, focusing specifically on the government's financing plans. The criticism is inherently political and centers on fiscal accountability, particularly concerning potential tax hikes, while demanding clarity regarding alternative solutions.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is aimed directly at the government and the minister, criticizing both the substance of the policy and its failed implementation. The criticism is intense and centers on the government's inability to execute a viable regional policy and secure adequate funding for local municipalities.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic, which is criticized for restricting the authority of the Riigikogu and surrendering legislative initiative, effectively turning the parliament into a rubber stamp. Furthermore, ideological opponents—labeled as "left-extremists" and "utopians"—are criticized, particularly concerning visa policy and renewable energy targets. The criticism is both procedural (balance of powers) and ideological (sovereignty, immigration).
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed against the inaction of the government or the responsible minister, who is criticized for the absence of a concrete action plan and for offering ineffective solutions (relying on sea eagles and jackals). The criticism is policy-based and intense, as the situation is deemed explosive.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary targets of criticism are the bill's proponents, who are being branded as "left-wing radicals." The criticism is intense and focuses on the substantive absurdity of the policy, calling into question the motives and judgment of the opposition ("Why are you submitting to every kind of ridiculous notion put forward by these left-wing radicals?").
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are "those very same parties," who are being criticized for a dangerous inconsistency: they previously demanded that gun permits be retained for Russian and Belarusian citizens, and now they are demanding voting rights. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of creating security threats (a fifth column) and establishing abnormal standards.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Prime Minister, the Reform Party government, and the coalition, all of whom face sharp criticism regarding both policy (cuts to benefits/subsidies) and values (disregard for family values). The intensity of the attacks is high, accusing the government of ignoring the demographic crisis and demonstrating a lack of concern.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government members (the defense, foreign, and prime ministers) for their silence and inaction during international defense capability discussions. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing them of delaying decisions and underestimating the seriousness of the situation. Separately, the defense minister is criticized for leaving the session.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The data is insufficient. The criticism is aimed at the lack of regulation and a natural threat (the excessive population of cormorants), not at specific political opponents.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the coalition parties (the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of double-dealing and deliberately leading the constitutional amendment process into a deadlock. The criticism is intense and addresses both political stances (such as voting rights for non-citizens) and procedural objectives, with the coalition's behavior being deemed "absolutely unacceptable."
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the parties of the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of excluding cross-party cooperation and employing "steamroller politics." The Social Democrats are intensely accused of "clearly pro-Russian blackmail," to which the other coalition partners have yielded. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, with critics suspecting the coalition has a hidden agenda to thwart the constitutional amendment.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government's inaction or the lack of debate on a critical issue. However, the criticism is rather indirect and is expressed in the form of a question. There are no direct attacks leveled against the minister or the government; instead, they simply demand that the topic be brought up for discussion.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at those who support the diversity of gender identity, and who are accused of normalizing deviance and confusing children at the primary school level. The criticism is intense and focuses on the harmful social and psychological consequences of the opponents’ actions.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The primary target is the government, which faces severe criticism regarding its policies (specifically the car tax) and ethical failures. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of insincerity and of taking money from the populace to deliver on dubious promises. The attacks specifically focus on the government's failure to provide adequate justification for supporting the car tax.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the government, which uses arguments (lack of money, waiting) to justify its inaction and postponement. The criticism is intense and policy-based, comparing the government's waiting to the catastrophic lack of preparations in 1940.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speech avoids direct criticism of any political opponent or faction. The focus remains on the details of implementing the policy (the car tax) and finding solutions, rather than engaging in political confrontation.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the government and a specific minister, who is accused of incompetence, ignoring the Riigikogu, and arrogant behavior. The criticism is intense and addresses both foreign policy errors (the strategy for supporting Ukraine) and violations of parliamentary procedures (refusal to answer and accusing others of lying).
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the practices of state institutions that have allowed criminals to obtain citizenship and ignored dual citizenship, as well as the corrupt activities of former PPA officials. The opposition is directed at the political and procedural laxity in the enforcement of laws, rather than at the individuals themselves, although the criminals are referred to as "scoundrels."
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Eesti 200) and Finance Minister Ligi, who are accused of blatant lying and the deliberate destruction of the state. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing specifically on tax hikes and cuts to family benefits. The speaker claims that the government is ignoring all proposals put forth by the opposition, which suggests that they are ruling out any possibility of compromise.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at those who do not see the need to establish an investigative commission, choosing instead to leave the question of accountability unresolved. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the opposing party of having no interest in clarifying why the duty of care or the law was breached.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's financial policy and Ministry of Finance officials. The budget is being intensely criticized on substantive grounds, with critics calling it catastrophic, which suggests that compromise regarding the current budget is ruled out.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is Minister Ligi, who is being criticized for both his policies (economic recession) and his personal conduct (arrogance, denial of criticism, and accusing MPs of lying). The opposition is intense and uncompromising, stressing that the grounds for a vote of no confidence have not disappeared.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at Minister of Economic Affairs Tiit Riisalo (Eesti 200) and his assertions regarding the detrimental impact of taxing extraordinary profits on Estonian business. The criticism is political and centers on the absence of substantive arguments, labeling the opposing side's claims as unsubstantiated assertions.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the government, particularly Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets, whose competence and responses are being called embarrassing and inadequate. Criticism is aimed both at specific political decisions (the removal of the monument, the acceptance of Ukrainian men) and at the government's alleged submission to the Russian Putinist narrative. No compromise is being offered; instead, they are demanding a complete change in policy and the repatriation of draft dodgers.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is directed at the government and the Finance Minister, who is criticized for the budget’s lack of transparency, flawed forecasts, and illogical expenditures (such as a failure to implement savings). The criticism is also personal, accusing the minister of arrogance, humiliating questioners, and incompetence (for example, not knowing the word "recession").
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which faces criticism both for its political decisions (the erosion of the sense of security) and for procedural failures (the violation of standard inclusion practices). The criticism is intense and moralistic, accusing the government of neglecting families and the public's livelihoods. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; quite the opposite, the opponent's actions are viewed as leading the nation toward disaster.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main focus of opposition is directed at the minister, whose explanations regarding the high cost of the internet are considered insufficient and illogical. The criticism is policy-driven, calling into question the management of state investments and the pricing policies of telecom companies.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary opposition is directed at the individual or group ("You") who drew a comparison between the unveiling of the Estonian freedom fighters' memorial and the unveiling of a monument dedicated to the Red Army occupiers. The criticism is intense and moral, accusing the opponent of defaming the nation's heroes (our fathers and grandmothers) and setting a poor example for young people.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The criticism targets the strategic planning of the government or the responsible agency, arguing that the procurement of ammunition is not balanced against the procurement of artillery. This is policy- and procedure-based criticism that calls into question the seriousness of developing the defense forces’ capabilities.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Strong opposition is directed at the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of pursuing policies that worsen Estonian business conditions and people's well-being. Criticism targets both political choices (the tax hike spree, Rail Baltic, the excessive green transition/green frenzy) and procedural violations (the rejection of proposed amendments). The speaker suggests that the coalition parties are only interested in filling the state treasury, not in ensuring the livelihood of the Estonian people.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Direct criticism is aimed at an earlier Riigikogu decision (2004), which, in the speaker's assessment, failed to take military aspects into account. Russia’s widespread use of mines in Ukraine is also highlighted as a negative example, contrasting this with the actions of countries that have joined the convention.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which stands accused of lying, destroying the economy, and mocking parliamentary principles. The criticism is both political (tax hikes) and procedural (violating the Rules of Procedure regarding the bundling of amendments). The speaker calls for the government to be removed and halted, ruling out any compromise whatsoever.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the government coalition parties (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200), who are criticized for their policies and their inaction. The criticism is intense, accusing the coalition of importing cheap labor through exceptions to the immigration quota and stifling economic development. It is also suggested that the coalition does not adequately support child protection.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and their ministry, particularly concerning those officials who are seen as the drivers of radical climate ideas. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the ministry of hiring "mad climate fanatics" in its personnel selection.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the government and the coalition, who are intensely criticized regarding their policies and values. The criticism targets specific political decisions, such as the disregard of the language proficiency requirement and maintaining the operation of the Ministry of Culture’s cultural diversity department.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the minister and the government as a whole, who are being criticized for political passivity and inefficiency regarding national issues. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, directly accusing the government of failing to represent Estonian interests.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the current e-voting system and its defenders, who claim the system complies with international norms ("That's what we're told..."). The criticism is procedural and systemic, focusing on deficiencies in reliability and verifiability.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main opponent is the coalition and the government (dubbed the "government of liars"), which is sharply criticized for both its policies (creating a dystopia, sheer madness) and procedural violations (breaching the constitution and the Rules of Procedure Act, employing steamroller tactics). The criticism is intense and uncompromisingly confrontational, accusing the coalition of abusing its power.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the distrusted minister, who is being criticized for the lackluster state of education policy and for self-adulation. The criticism also extends to other cabinet members, who are accused of imposing financial policy dogmas and obstructing the minister's work.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is directed against the Reform Party government and the Constitutional Committee, who are being criticized for refusing to carry out an international audit. The criticism is both intense and procedural, accusing the opposing side of avoiding the verification of the electoral system's reliability and misrepresenting election security. The chairman of the Constitutional Committee is being particularly sharply attacked for allegedly presenting false information regarding OECD reports.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is aimed at the Minister of Culture and the government, criticizing both their integration policy and the Minister's conduct during the session. The criticism is intense and addresses both the substance of the policy (support for multiculturalism) and procedural incompetence (failure to answer questions). There is no willingness to compromise, as the government's actions are considered to be in direct violation of the constitution.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats) and specific ministers, who are being criticized both for political decisions (such as the abolition of family benefits) and for inaction (ignoring the demographic crisis). The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of destroying the foundations of the Estonian nation-state.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the government and the commission, who are criticized for illogical policies and for bringing about a demographic catastrophe. The criticism is intense and ranges from political dissent to accusations of undermining state security and acting in the interests of the enemy.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government as a whole, especially Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets. The criticism is intense and spans from policy issues (family benefits, immigration) to personal accusations (lying, lack of patriotism). The speaker describes the government’s actions as "hostile" and "disastrous" and shows no readiness for compromise.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition and the Reform Party, who are criticized both for their policies (tax terror, disregard for e-elections) and their procedural conduct. The criticism is intense and calls the government’s legitimacy into question, citing public outrage and the lack of reliability regarding e-elections. The coalition is accused of indifference, except when the topic concerns their own financial compensation.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is in an oppositional position relative to the government, criticizing the minister for the delayed initiation of the necessary oversight procedure. The criticism is directed at the quality of governance and points to broader systemic problems, such as the existence of a deep state, regarding which the minister's stance is being demanded.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The main adversary is the government, which is being criticized for causing the economic recession and inflation, and for shortcomings in the national defense strategy. The criticism is particularly sharp regarding the government's attempt to remove a provision from the security document that mandates resistance to foreign aggression under all circumstances. Criticism is also directed at the Commander of the Defense Forces' stance regarding the permanent presence of allied units.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government/coalition and the Riigikogu committee, which rejected a security-related bill. The criticism is both procedural (the unjustified rejection of the committee's decision) and political (the avoidance of strengthening security). The speaker expresses deep distrust, hinting that the government fears ongoing scrutiny and is hiding something.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed directly at the Prime Minister and the ruling coalition, who are accused of destroying the Estonian nation. The criticism is intense and covers both political choices (tax terror, immigration) and institutional decisions (the abolition of a minister and a commission). There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, this is a direct attack against the government's inaction.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is strongly opposed to the governing coalition and liberal parties. The criticism is both substantive (the coalition’s support for extremist Islamists in the oppression of women) and procedural (the a priori rejection and delaying of opposition bills). He/She accuses opponents of hypocrisy and a lack of desire to deal with real problems, such as security threats and discrimination against women.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized over the issue of restricting voting rights for choosing a complicated and ineffective legislative path. The criticism is aimed at procedural inconsistency and the avoidance of a simple, constitutionally compliant solution.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party-led government and the prime minister, who are directly accused of lying, incompetence, and destroying the economy. The criticism is intense and covers both political decisions (tax increases) and personal accusations (lying regarding defense expenditures). There is no willingness to compromise; the focus is on demanding accountability.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is highly critical, accusing the coalition of engaging in "power politics" and using a "steamroller" to override the opposition. The criticism targets both procedural issues (the systematic rejection of substantive proposals) and policy matters (the Reform Party's tax hikes and the hypocrisy of the Social Democrats). The speaker is convinced that the coalition has absolutely no desire to cooperate with the opposition.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government and the ruling coalition, who are accused of dismantling the Estonian nation-state and prioritizing multiculturalism. The criticism is intense and politically value-driven, also accusing the coalition of running the economy into the ground and failing to support farmers. The opponents' worldview is considered irrelevant to the Estonian nation and culture.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient information
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is Kaja Kallas’s government and the coalition parties (Eesti 200, Social Democrats), who are accused of harming Estonian interests, incompetence, and corruption (Russian business dealings, theft of Ukrainian donations). The criticism is intense, ranging from political decisions (the closure of consulates) to personal ethical violations, and demands the government's resignation. The opposition is absolute, as the government has "led Estonia into the highest inflation and deepest recession in Europe."
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are ideological circles referred to as "extreme-left-green-liberals" and "eco-nuts," along with specific Reform Party members of parliament (Jürgen Ligi, Joller). The criticism is both procedural (misinterpreting the law) and personal/ideological, accusing the opponents of spreading conspiracy theories and deliberately misleading people. Compromise is ruled out, and the opponents' positions are deemed "absurd" and "nonsensical."
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data