By Months: Henn Põlluaas

The confrontation is extremely intense and personal, with the opponent being directly accused of lying and demagoguery regarding the support and training provided to those of mobilization age. The criticism targets the factual inaccuracy of the opponent's claims, using the question, "Why are you lying here?" to intensify the attack.

The primary criticism targets the inaction of the government and various ministries (specifically the Ministry of Defence) and legislative negligence (draft legislation lacking proper impact assessments). A particularly sharp and personal attack was leveled against "Eesti 200 and the right-wing circle of defense" concerning the Slava Ukraini scandal, accusing them of evading responsibility and refusing to reclaim the stolen funds.

The main opponents are the Prime Minister and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of raising the tax burden and jeopardizing national security through changes to visa policy. The external adversary is Russia, which is labeled the "empire of evil," and whose hybrid warfare threat is highlighted both in the context of mines and visa policy. The criticism is intense, focusing both on policy and personal attacks (specifically accusing the Prime Minister of lying).

The main opponents are the government and the coalition parties (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200), who are accused of inadequacy, naivety, and disarming the state. The criticism is intense and ranges from political decisions (funding, energy policy) to historical mistakes (joining the Ottawa Convention). The opponents' motives are suspected, with suggestions that the undercurrents of foreign pressure may have been orchestrated from Moscow.

The main opponents are the government (which is accused of turning the Riigikogu into a rubber stamp) and left-radical/left-extremist ideological forces that are pressuring Estonia towards gender quotas and mass immigration. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the government's inaction (the cormorant problem) and on legislative restrictions that undermine the state's sovereignty and parliamentary right to make decisions. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, there is a call to reject the draft laws.

The main opposition is directed at the Reform Party government and coalition, who are criticized for delaying decisions, setting priorities (demography), and failing to emphasize Estonia's status as a frontline state on the international arena. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, accusing ministers of ignoring the issue and leaving during the debate. Separately, politicians who employ dangerous "fifth column" rhetoric are criticized, with many considering it outright perilous.

The primary adversaries are the coalition parties (the Reform Party, Estonia 200) and the Social Democrats. They face sharp criticism for backing voting rights for non-citizens and for engaging in alleged duplicitous procedural maneuvering. The criticism is intense and highly political, accusing them of perpetuating a national security risk and manufacturing a scenario designed to shift blame onto the opposition.

The main opponent is the ruling government coalition (the Reform Party, Eesti 200, the Social Democrats). Criticism is directed both at political decisions (the car tax, inaction on national defense) and at the procedural steamrolling tactics employed. The Social Democrats are specifically highlighted for "clearly pro-Russian blackmail" regarding citizenship issues, with the coalition being accused of political spin.